Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey

Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> Tue, 03 September 2024 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <debcooley1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BC4C1D874D; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mNInz40PI-es; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC36C137362; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d8a744aa9bso2137815a91.3; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725393961; x=1725998761; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Bx+DYSvblXmOQiTOXVujDZJF3/gCMDP0xR8MgRe/jYs=; b=Tv04botP4xiRi14gJT58cbZgDZEQ9+8A5Ed7Nx2CeGct5+JWk5o+v/E7pI59pwSj/8 XIOq9PCoODF4Q4oTNsAIcOuXZJqeR5O/QC0BV6uO2EqmNdYS/pI+4veJ/iSVUtCv1IMr BHawEqSbo3G6l111Rq19+tQF2z6EKuf2WXZS2c9VhDCWs05d+F1nYU5Esz6xs7UeaEPx YWEeiYxHBNRcS6RZw0XCai6LqecftxF3ARASxb9pHPbCfoI3VePZu2Xf6zTeUB6bLY2m 5NHjtXpcofOjgMi5BFdf5RdZe4A+mXOskX4+2/NMvBRJZiZda/gJKSVnbGZh9/QJzQr1 2KtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725393961; x=1725998761; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Bx+DYSvblXmOQiTOXVujDZJF3/gCMDP0xR8MgRe/jYs=; b=KBY1Zfg7TJJwYRlTxJ5/js0ngA7AJg6WYag+ny0/2n4qG6h1r35TXd8+fy7vfBlhKh PQ5BXDVBoujJh2gJAUVS+wp4wff00IUEEfiYIQphNiIHlgQZ6EgEsjMkf4d7rJQxqkqy eLrPtr6Bx7UotnEWJJomjs/f/B49evc6BbVOnIeb/ODD68lMCVVNGpyMhxN9tiQBYrHC j8b3umU65/peWx7GV+i6gv0TvRT5PS8eKlTM7WNjbbade/ZT9clyLXPDgAWOeSKYmorp V4oQBlasL760vpjx5HiC0GjcxblC6uqpnNieDeWT2gs3ZdeW22HPSGR013jpidKCcDIs ALMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyCf/B52tAZ10IBy8pJ9yw829amBbfp4XW9acjdkH2y0hGojuuY Ra5CRKqOzssK1ikgLFC6fPdm+9itFNmtZIf9GzzoWt1/1Br/e6iysjyKcc3hEVSeGYZP75JtoSo nH63oiroSXqDGpH+/Uxz4SCTISIsD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEaMjZGoa0tsWlRzWr2AhyAMSUUKyrOfrFQUn1sxqbTkhHSRCoT0tkku7zifOg9oIxoBp0ixBGn/kAtIuQjuu0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b016:b0:2d8:40be:263a with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d8973a5691mr10704601a91.34.1725393960896; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 13:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7487E6AA-A8BE-42A9-9E80-F85C49ABF026@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <7487E6AA-A8BE-42A9-9E80-F85C49ABF026@ietf.org>
From: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:05:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGgd1Of=8mAeG4tBn+7fc+phHJA8PwZK3y+KBZz+hyEZ-P2qeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000023159206213c96c5"
Message-ID-Hash: ZDFNDG32EHOVYCVISR5GUDATWIWFOKYG
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZDFNDG32EHOVYCVISR5GUDATWIWFOKYG
X-MailFrom: debcooley1@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-wgchairs.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: wgchairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/6Xg_BjMd1GevAnw8K9Tb_am0GkU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:wgchairs-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-leave@ietf.org>

I went and looked at the comments on the last question (10 pages of
comments) and only two/three of them were about the in-session chat. Seems
like most people (who answered the survey) didn't think this was worth
listing as an issue.  For what it is worth, when I post minutes, I usually
go through the chat log to pick up comments that were made there.  As
chairs, we may need to go back to chat monitors (I was going to say jabber
scribes, duh!).

Many more comments on:  visas, COVID, food, and the cost of staying in
Vancouver.  A handful of comments on the network and Meetecho issues.

Deb

On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:12 PM Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> There were a number of aspects to the feedback in the post-IETF 120
> meeting survey that are worth highlighting and updating you on.
>
> 1.  Comments that the in-session chat is a distraction. This is one we
> will monitor and possibly ask specific questions about in the next
> post-meeting survey.  There was a suggestion of explicit pauses in sessions
> to allow people, particularly presenters, to catch up with the chat but I
> have no idea how practical that is.
>
> 2.  Comments about managing slides and presentations, that we will pass on
> to Meetecho.
>
> 3.  Comments about the use of screen space in rooms and how that can be
> improved.  The meetings operations team are reviewing this and we’ll see
> what improvements we can make.
>
> As a reminder, the survey dashboard is at [1] and the last question, Q27,
> has the free form comments.
>
> cheers
> Jay
>
>
> [1]
> https://ietf.co1.qualtrics.com/results/public/aWV0Zi1VUl8zT3laRG9JQWxidUkxZ0otNjZjMzQwNWI4ZjhlYTQwMDA4Nzg5MjNi#/pages/Page_1fe9399e-cacb-4063-af49-ee1340c57993
>
> --
> Jay Daley
> IETF Executive Director
> exec-director@ietf.org
>
>