IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (was: Re: John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences)

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71B53A0A9C; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.275, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7_FyFBVTm2ad; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0316F3A0A9B; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 09SFRZMw022419 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:27:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1603898858; bh=wOgWiQqMt1zjb8fzFbkp2GZLx1PvhW7ob2XnHmuv0ko=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=EdGOOVk9aMVOdbj4LEBit01/Lp4u4F2pkejLYnRTkSVhMVmj6mlTDEIwPRmodQUVJ A6ugr/O9uzWLsyQJKAE0fSw4BzQ1xYOYdkNGxjf+e/5K+PGtX0SqcIG31j0PAKjWb8 K6d7gLF+P31Z4STuvqSIRuZHqFXopaEmhkyELFZ0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
Subject: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (was: Re: John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences)
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, rsoc@iab.org
References: <20201026181442.GA2438@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAMm+LwiVmE=qtSPCMD-3foPODL8bgETj3dQDKS-3BOM2021dEg@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdSeTDWy_0fCV25ykxKFMV1ZBtUMMNesoOuaXCzFVfpOA@mail.gmail.com> <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <7caa5bed-febc-dc71-ec0f-b4d4e951e01a@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:27:35 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/6iDJFpwkyiZk4lF8h1UdUn9uUkk>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:27:46 -0000

On 10/27/20 6:57 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> [Yikes, this discussion is getting crossposted everywhere, it seems. 
> I’ll keep it brief]
>
>
Any chance we can cut down the crossposting and move this conversation 
to one place? There are already several examples of messages that only 
occur on one of the lists, so unless everyone reads all of the lists 
from all of the crossposts, there'll be missed comments.

I'd suggest rfc-i?

RjS

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email