Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 02 September 2024 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84043C14F699 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FjNTAohA2e8I for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1FBC14F615 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [213.233.155.170]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76AA21E039; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 18:14:20 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <ybl5xrdpvai.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 23:14:08 +0100
Message-Id: <924A4F84-84A9-4F8D-9AFC-F5746172F00E@pfrc.org>
References: <ybl5xrdpvai.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21F90)
Message-ID-Hash: B32BV7KOYK44TCHSY3AA2XBVELI3DRAA
X-Message-ID-Hash: B32BV7KOYK44TCHSY3AA2XBVELI3DRAA
X-MailFrom: jhaas@pfrc.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-wgchairs.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: wgchairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/6npSU7f5Wfxgiz10h7rloDZWw4E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:wgchairs-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-leave@ietf.org>


> On Sep 2, 2024, at 23:04, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:
> 
> Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> writes:
> 
>> However, those engaged in the chat are missing what the meeting has
>> moved on to.
> 
> One other "moved on to" example is that people wanted to keep talking
> about the last presentation and frequently carry on when the agenda
> itself has moved on.  It always seems like the chat is "one topic
> behind" because of that, and makes me wonder if everyone is actually
> following the new topic as well.

Effectively an existence proof that a topic hadn’t had enough discussion. 

Too often sessions are a race to see who can flip slides the fastest and how many presentations can be fit into the time. 

Jeff
> 
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> USC/ISI