Re: My notes from the chairs training sessions

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 02 December 2021 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD373A0863 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:10:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.931
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.931 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ek4ax3-iN8NT for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F6FF3A085F for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.34.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 1B2KA3KJ024608 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:10:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1638475803; bh=+j4ZS8SeIUME386RmX7KlxJRe6/c1djbC1m5y7/rczw=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=aU5W2CS1u+YXe/UZXBv/7PrOA5kNkDz322+MPZID8JzCc4T55rQNADQLV78SSjZec vwaqekTMDzgVadC77hY8NlLZfTy8x/NZR5YsIVxCCtUE9by8Ogya3G7KqIcqeeNtv1 vgbN8fY21h8JbLYbzTbeKHuZuy1SFBJYah3d3KZE=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.34.206] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Message-ID: <9ec18c24-97ea-5dd5-46ab-109a64563946@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 14:10:02 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Subject: Re: My notes from the chairs training sessions
Content-Language: en-US
To: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <d5dbfecf-4357-417e-aaa2-d810fac36154@dogfood.fastmail.com> <146176.1638469065@dooku>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <146176.1638469065@dooku>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/6uEqopcsDKRFvN2DHO63cpbPiVc>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 20:10:11 -0000

Applying a lot of context-away:

>      > * β€œIs this the hill you are willing to die on?” β†’ sometimes can encourage consensus.

Is there a way to apply this kind of pressure without using that 
particular idiom?

RjS