Re: Guidelines for IETF 111 session requests

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 15 April 2021 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB4C3A266F; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y159MF4o4moJ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 522533A266E; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4AF38FF0; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:50:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hVcotu0dJCJF; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:50:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090B838FED; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:50:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E2D114; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:43:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Lars Eggert <chair@ietf.org>
cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Guidelines for IETF 111 session requests
In-Reply-To: <4B8970B4-D104-4A8D-A69F-91B3BAC812FD@ietf.org>
References: <4B8970B4-D104-4A8D-A69F-91B3BAC812FD@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:43:18 -0400
Message-ID: <7129.1618504998@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/7q25J4VkK8nW1AfcIVXkBxHvo48>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:43:25 -0000

Lars Eggert <chair@ietf.org> wrote:
    > * We also request you to carefully review your list of conflicts, instead of
    > simply copying the previous meeting’s list. Inaccurate conflict reporting
    > creates real conflicts.

A major source of challenge has been how to avoid BOFs, particularly unknown
BOFs. (i.e., ones we don't yet know about!)
Can you offer more guidance here?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide