Re: Please comment on your use of trac

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 25 February 2021 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F763A0EF1; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:58:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NimnCFI_mSa5; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com (mail-oi1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46B7F3A0EF0; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id w69so7862921oif.1; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aJq39yn7yaiPR0W6jizyTQfGK0BaXAeYr/3NkkqsdGw=; b=lNVKRw0kFPNK2ynT0+tRKeMkyNgPOAMTpxczgTpoLvVhwk/CtsJ5jRVx9+xiXI2KHa MEG/hc332N0P/XH02dAwd85NNfep0h9jjh+4ivOtd92kin5fLVczEQZYFjoLPt1jmYnt WeqsF81hYLE+iTNLFiGIRvR6hrtCdRS8fZy0Oj1JJ/sKV0YLxCKQQw8BwTCQtx+gCqJy smvxGpqMg/kumVrnzGdB2wY70HM1BHDEyph5n8Lk+XpXm/w6AnYp28qCwvQVlOpGGbJ+ CW1F1qBcAbWGEIKSK/Jc92ljyHRj6Rp7LbMPrY0ELycDfCf3wH+LuxIUYJQz01sPnc8Q GONg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aJq39yn7yaiPR0W6jizyTQfGK0BaXAeYr/3NkkqsdGw=; b=i3CShWzYsBnebofWPH9klKDSFYt1TRuckIeyEvAQ5DfuHPqFAC9sfzhokv7MYxAJXi WYww1sV8RPbmMDo6y88Va7ZMYSLEduITH/jsv2JmpnI1au1fu7CoAU84OHO6d67Y15za 3Qw4r2DieK+PHXcIs9sOZCLgaTIETfRv5BJNizIumFli5cNIQZRAgvfSiy2SEbpsKh+N wnnWBuhvyOxR6zg4MujrbtooXpTtbq2QPZe0dWMXbWpZOorIwOPGhqc6IQAyYze5+ydI VuZXm0Iw+et/XkE5bxRzqk69oMu3x4BEnTleli35PhfRBWSXJfFmbE6BF6WccRBWDukw RFlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533L36XwYI2jkQk+kxgLVx+PdoK7QMIVvjlw55IqcD/CxSqPRn54 npru3tWmdy8+ZEV03kCFrGgW5SWDhmqn9zMcc/mJ4Ig5fLY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyT7CerTU2sUCZ8CIx1rGH8+jvtaQyWEJ1dGGlHzb4fuiEwYxTMbt2ZKNjLGKd1hSWvMs8OKpDNJKkMi1xtxP0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:154:: with SMTP id h20mr66971oie.45.1614293898586; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:58:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a77623bc-bebb-3aa2-4cf7-d645e00dcd45@nostrum.com> <99EEE704-6166-48FB-BAAF-953FDD066065@ietf.org> <CADyWQ+E99azbLWsgDXDfR_KTyj4-q-JH3y6E9w_CXO8kKbv+Vg@mail.gmail.com> <F195CCB2-4CF5-418E-96E1-26173D57A1A0@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F195CCB2-4CF5-418E-96E1-26173D57A1A0@ietf.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:58:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FsD=awAz0AEzGjBwm1K=DDKt4sOT_DMx5D0td5rKdRhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Please comment on your use of trac
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000636c9e05bc3116bb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/7siqWQpRwQMwfVXtMXgOiMgT_wU>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:58:21 -0000

Thanks!

Give credit to my co-chair Benno Overeinder for this thinking.
(also does make sense to always use ietf.org URLs in our documents,
as we can control the endpoint)

tim


On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:49 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 26/02/2021, at 11:47 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Jay
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:40 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> I’m in the process of drafting the RFP for this work and I want to check
>> a few things base on your replies:
>>
>> 2.  A few WGs - EMAILCORE, DMARC and TSVWG are using trac for issue
>> tracking and need migrating to a new issue tracker.  Would you be happy if
>> that was GitHub? (DMARC has already indicated this is acceptable).
>>
>
> DMARC chair here - totally happy with github or a github-like system.
>
>>
>> 3.  Many more WGs used to use trac for issue tracking but no longer do.
>> We need to find a way to archive these for the historical record, but I
>> want to check you would be happy if that was just an export to a text file
>> that could then be a wiki page rather than moving them to a new issue
>> tracking system?
>>
>> 4.  The following features for a new wiki system have been recommended:
>>
>>         * document names resolve to links to the documents without having
>> to require explicit URLs.
>>         * I would like a markdown based wiki system.
>>
>
> In DNSOP we *just* added a page in the wiki.
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dnsop/wiki/RFC8976ZONEMDTestCases
> which is ending up in an RFC (I blame Warren).  I assume that as part of
> the migration is having 302 Redirects
> for such URLs.
>
>
> It is now.
>
> thanks
> Jay
>
>
> Thanks
>
> tim
>
>
> --
> Jay Daley
> IETF Executive Director
> jay@ietf.org
>
>