IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: problem with recent drafts on tools.ietf.org? {35440727}

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 04 March 2021 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FF63A133C for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:52:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89HYZsDw4mAD for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F7553A133B for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id z13so30683568iox.8 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 09:52:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fBnoGYusHDejlOfKckacHCgcsK9WeF+yynu72lFMeV8=; b=d40r2Otk8sUNGkUG0bexXE2FmUgaH082aDHMtYZfYCa63edPouXwU2i8NiACp/q19L WWmEgoS2k3GakveOFzMwYJ6pIJ57RrQleUcPvpeKYWZhPSWuvMWS2Et0TlkL+NwIh5We yWpll+zE+2qjche+iZ8/p4ETiceqPPt/+6nMV3FpeSbu3iGmN2aMULLENQWPlZTRWz+A RVFdnAIsmGPcQGd2o+qd3nBWH9Jm0H089taQO7R6iMRP38Mfmr87a6mYDvDrM66gbfxk LGjOj6SdBN1lNV7um7oLHI6yF0mh30sP6oIjoedfqpYluRROi87aBWxtWgqGJWuzEc2b Vv/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fBnoGYusHDejlOfKckacHCgcsK9WeF+yynu72lFMeV8=; b=a091SEfiz0QztbCpN5QPPJwr+VpKXwI2YPVjLb/BbZLYOVwjyUj5CScItPHpan9yX6 bBwqNMT2DKFRKATqw7VOlVPBggUHWje8IYsz/KzxR/7+bfko6UWoPatUjtrloVGlYLsh JC8yYp8PqZnJ4Grv9wgJuSvbS4sBsSimhQBK2OayiY1z+2ljLidy/2T7AeNw0+Tuzy8K 9lyINmfBeQfEx5dfR8hAphcHdCQJgKTBvyiaNPQLBhUleMRBGZm6rXpS8SWDXxI3lxGr UevnxSY32vG61BjY2TjoSL1Kua9zhfwcYm72NuMWoG/GubJgayitC/XGloFoxIcCs2vz tS6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BXBt5OSQuuCHPgBv2w702FhQKs5SWlMsaFpohp9izf0sPnptt r36OO7DdEFhR1CEpoYhgPd8ni1iJUdHACPscscY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWY28Ky107eO9mVbjI+oKwAEf9JwcuUpeV8nWyDjW7qsD66oocZEm/xxz/UC9BD+3LSAO3i1RUtUEHQFPDWcg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:98:: with SMTP id h24mr4573652iob.19.1614880356987; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 09:52:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <35440727.JitbitHelpdesk.46704.0bb5cf6e-5ee4-475f-a405-1f97b826a0a9@jitbit.com> <fcb1efac-931e-3c68-21f6-954c053c99e3@labn.net> <CAOW+2dsx3rh8pC8Xkg=77kFtxcjc_qfheosYgH+348=E4aNAKQ@mail.gmail.com> <58513A0C-AB7D-491B-A2F0-EC3EF023C8F9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <58513A0C-AB7D-491B-A2F0-EC3EF023C8F9@gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 09:52:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTZM03AnZ0dASjguwWdQkUjHB+9paQZxUDzx0km0HQE_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: problem with recent drafts on tools.ietf.org? {35440727}
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000008741605bcb9a2b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/8SzOlSVGuOvYOxfZNjhJW710r7E>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:52:39 -0000

IMO the problem is not the LLC's recent actions, but that important IETF
resources were the personal property of a volunteer.

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:50 AM Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bernard,
>
> > On Mar 3, 2021, at 5:32 PM, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Lou --
> >
> > Agree that this is troubling. SDOs often reference specification
> versions on the tools.ietf.org, and I regularly use the tools there to do
> tasks relating to IETF draft submission.  So if at all possible, we should
> try to maintain the site in operation.
>
> I agree, most time I do a search for a draft a link to the tool.ietf.org
> comes up first.  I think it is a big IETF operational problem now that the
> site has stopped working as expected.
>
> It’s unfortunate that the LLC didn’t think this through when they did the
> things that caused Henrik to step away.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:55 PM Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> > Well this is a troubling response -- does anyone know if there's plans
> for tools.ietf.org? I would have thought that some thought would be given
> to this and maybe some announcement made to the IETF.  Did I miss it???
> Are we just destined to the whims of bit rot?
> >
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email