Re: Support (as co-author)

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 26 November 2019 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D281F121021 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ci6N4ynAjv-S for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87BD121004 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id 193so9415674pfc.13 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=QOCBZHXnE2KJW1FF1dx1KLHtm7cQfSr73zqG+fOubRg=; b=EJzjrao7ceq90fZl1C2ODm6fUef2b3JWa3sdQ7sDlllzedNoNUFTyHe4gDNDd0ihKt aJYaYU7zvoHauUb6wWMDiKoLWe0jBlM4yhNSyIHhaUvrp8btQQ06q6nhhctmM6I635Tv 6yjHNOPvJ8YOXOr+Y4am3OvD3sgFAkqb/n5BS1BYK39SgyCcx0aQUvZnZXI2R/NZp42T cl8OUq6VcRIQDDu1f/DFDx+meBIJEbmaRsykcwaNZmI/h7OvaiAiIu1JpuIw0oaGjg4b C1uwR/CygdqqbWYYtw3BJLe2ZXHTaMtw6PNAGC+b7XdXxzHxCdN7xcYFObhPUudZ+rrN cVrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=QOCBZHXnE2KJW1FF1dx1KLHtm7cQfSr73zqG+fOubRg=; b=OhTYt5ryHKXV4Mt/vwX8TUb9e5DdrAT7RgdEaQGD/3nYP5Zb+cszrG2Ft0ArKXwH9j 6WWqfPqP7b78I+HOnQJc8F4nyxznA4qQNgDrtC4fkCl2fQ7FbVvhHXUTUi88LSgD1vN9 EWZXxGUmgGlmAmzgCZ1yBec28b0ubVD9P9VWZGuU2zM1L3ZwkGypnBZDPYT8XDuf9T1I vKTvf4Q68ZKzGU1PeTs4oPgLRjGCgTTBHX5x83PCGjYssLgWJDSehK3UOu2I7rZquYMV Y+YUUWy0/kdDuJWxoxyWH/VfIvEI7ubGzMLoQAQs9bV3i/C/GXqrSEXJssxqug3XjFpP WUsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW6b7Mm8gbbw4Ygy6qSNy46zkm3HpxhayxoILJiIKpP1VmBSM+s QbigTd8cQee7kWO7GYR60Sw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzuqFni5cPAANvFCnYsD2z4G7lDeVG1kir+jUTAZASIAuqRWPud8706QCiSlIz+UKaZ2lDjXw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:5216:: with SMTP id g22mr40922119pfb.78.1574785869429; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:7c6c:bf76:449e:624b? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:7c6c:bf76:449e:624b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 21sm13334219pfa.170.2019.11.26.08.31.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <52E68411-998E-46D3-8F05-F5EA41C102B4@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8AF1C690-5A47-4CBD-8475-B679575F96D5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Support (as co-author)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:07 -0800
In-Reply-To: <5871efb6-9fa7-a06a-e201-fb9fba04935e@cisco.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <5871efb6-9fa7-a06a-e201-fb9fba04935e@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/9cUgoFkpt-7-S4UWr3XezdsQy8Q>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 16:31:12 -0000

Hi,

My take on this is that having one’s name as an author is implicitly a sign of support.   No need to state it on the list in an adoption call.   If you don’t support it, you should ask that your name be removed.

Isn’t this the reason we see drafts with long author lists?

Relating to this, I think that someone should only be listed as an author if they have written words in the document.   I dislike the trend to listing names of people as authors who have not contributed to the text.

Bob


> On Nov 25, 2019, at 7:09 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Along the years, I witnessed a trend, which intensifies with time: "I support the adoption of this draft (as a co-author)."
> Well, if someone is a co-author, implicitly this person wants the draft to progress. Therefore, such as message carries no weight IMO.
> Is it time for the WG chairs to start correcting this behaviour, or at least setting the right expectations?
> 
> ex: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/?q=Adoption%20Call%20for%20draft-ioamteam-ippm-ioam-direct-export
> 
> Regards, Benoit
> 
> 
>