IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Please comment on your use of trac

Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net> Thu, 04 February 2021 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <valery@smyslov.net>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10D03A10FE for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 22:23:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=smyslov.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3YolmVy7XICS for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 22:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857C63A10FA for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 22:23:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyslov.net ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rzjoyw0Y5a/26hwNJUXKAXbVOhJ+0zJm1tIWoOCUQBY=; b=ihqS6LDhnC8gUy7Ojs2RmxL5HU PBNci0nQaR0CEsjrb4/uNxDgvr4F82HcAdlePLFZefd7hxDNsvHaUL8SApjOy1eY34x32B0Fo+FdX otg/M7SrD7+0VstLHlpSL9qVPrOWp/Y9wOvl/z2UYJT+ZOG8nHjb2mfyqKoExYvE6lA+Pdc/Kvl2V MhHRgDPzXhBYN6Z6okbtk6ykPalHs6wbEgV7X+6QupFGYckTZjKMFHBGJxEQzX7ekyQ77PbiBYrmU Zkf2fN3Z4G0iPwXx+WbVe5eLgjQZ6apmR5NoOezXJ58deVwXOfwFN5TDq4TER+PvP90Bdag5xxuiB z3qEEEIA==;
Received: from [93.188.44.203] (port=52202 helo=buildpc) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <valery@smyslov.net>) id 1l7Y2z-0000BE-Qn; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 01:23:22 -0500
From: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
To: 'Robert Sparks' <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <a77623bc-bebb-3aa2-4cf7-d645e00dcd45@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <a77623bc-bebb-3aa2-4cf7-d645e00dcd45@nostrum.com>
Subject: RE: Please comment on your use of trac
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:23:21 +0300
Message-ID: <11c001d6fabe$3e3b4410$bab1cc30$@smyslov.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQINpJQNhZKwFXuxkdVvk7m32NSCPqnaMm2w
Content-Language: ru
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/9eO2S-zx0ecahVotyVjVXiyXzL8>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:23:26 -0000

HI Robert,

UTA and DOTS don't use trac.

Regards,
Valery.

> We currently have instances of trac configured for each working group.
> Only some are being used.
> 
> If your group is using trac, are you using anything essentially
> trac-specific that you find important?
> 
> Would you be ok migrating (with help) to a different wiki system and a
> different issue tracking system?
> 
> The trac project itself is lagging with Python development - stable
> still only runs on Python 2.7 and while there appears to be work towards
> Python 3, it is not yet functional, and is not progressing quickly. We
> are working around it by encapsulating it in docker instances running 2.7.
> 
> I've had several people suggest we should stop supporting it, and I'd
> like to know if that would be a particular hardship for any group.
> 
> RjS
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email