IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Holding an action

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 14 May 2021 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075F73A2D8E for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V3guihlCD7vc for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33C693A2D89 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcb12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FhPgq6Hg9zyyf; Fri, 14 May 2021 12:21:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Subject: Re: Holding an action
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <2E02B592-557A-9F48-BB26-8836ED0A08CD@hxcore.ol>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:21:02 +0200
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02789AC2-461C-4BDF-A76D-99ADFB317CA9@tzi.org>
References: <5FDD7FD3-FC0F-DD41-9F1A-48930BBBF22D@hxcore.ol> <6.2.5.6.2.20210514020559.0eeeefa0@elandnews.com> <2E02B592-557A-9F48-BB26-8836ED0A08CD@hxcore.ol>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/B-JhY7omTYdEFbkdRUGrGEspFUk>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:21:30 -0000

> On 14. May 2021, at 11:18, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, and I know that. My point is: there is no use telling people that they have an action without telling them what it is.

Actually, there is a lot of use in telling people they are blocking something.
If they don’t know how they do, they then know they can ask their friendly chair/AD.
(I wouldn’t mind adding more information, but the feature is useful as it is.   And someone would need to add that information...)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email