Re: IETF 111 Preliminary Agenda

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 26 June 2021 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50BD3A07B6 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 02:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v8dYZ1ira7QH for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 02:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77E2D3A07B0 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 02:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GBpcf5y5pz2xGL; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Subject: Re: IETF 111 Preliminary Agenda
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <C22C6D2A-49FF-4C5B-BD62-6C28726E7D03@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:34:58 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 646392898.455518-4edb3167643e1b3b0fbfd6d864b77e43
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EF9E60BF-8CC6-4C78-BD12-9890E33E6612@tzi.org>
References: <162465090423.3801.432976783697190400@ietfa.amsl.com> <8023.1624654313@localhost> <C22C6D2A-49FF-4C5B-BD62-6C28726E7D03@cisco.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/BweqLbJPlWRMc3mK8IRVDvhGL-0>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 09:35:07 -0000

On 2021-06-26, at 08:42, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Having interest in 36 WG (if I counted them correctly) and having only 5 days of meeting with 3 slots per day, i.e., 15 slots => you are doomed to have conflict of course ;-)
> 
> A big constrain is the 6 hours per day when being remote.

So we (T2TRG) went out of the way and had an interim instead (yes, before Juhannus/Midsommar :-).

Maybe it would help if we could qualify specific interims as “milestone meeting” or some such.  To distinguish working interims (where we usually discuss a single subject or a block of closely related ones) from milestone, whole-WG interims (like IETF meeting slots tend to be).  Just a thought.

Grüße, Carsten