Re: Proposed sliders for WG meetings should have a more prominent placement
Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> Wed, 05 November 2025 00:52 UTC
Return-Path: <aaron@parecki.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: wgchairs@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A731831A392 for <wgchairs@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:52:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=parecki.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ntRkb9LubXUf for <wgchairs@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:52:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1724831A38B for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:52:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7a9c64dfa6eso2684535b3a.3 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:52:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parecki.com; s=google; t=1762303974; x=1762908774; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3uXCP7hkVw5kAaFI/jBmU3ZxymdAU6NBzwRCQ2WOQk8=; b=YA3FmvR3irYeQLyvOPXgxyK/ZpJfr+1bunn49ViW+jwQLjh0ARaWFLk1wMrSToOgep Eksr4c3Drn3efvkjFb9yPtxceFqiCykMGoBJpnQeW227UARWGqfgnxSfPJe4+tlngziy h5U1VzwGJFPU47pYbm9lb/rWkOGsxgUey7Gp5nsfbS4lqSIDUb4SVbas/cPtPUPmINs9 Y8Ch+XPEvfQuBLQq14o25w4JR07tMKWWq5CxecECw+woHH3TLuQxqQ4Z0oWafNRHMf+I h+nUVivqif2n3Khfbra4ssBh4HgrpQ2LU/dO0oPhTx6aKqWzwvSJoypZ49QdBLu8dIgb QxLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762303974; x=1762908774; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3uXCP7hkVw5kAaFI/jBmU3ZxymdAU6NBzwRCQ2WOQk8=; b=P04KOiAkMibZlmz0AbNUvoFxq52z+kzR7j7HafEEwtGaku3doBnMFPQd2fOg0C4rUr C87hGYN5hbHUnGxcDltrAGYrLKOqiRXiIXN2yq3iik0lOnXMt1065nuK9ui702R98kfd Oz1tW+pqjSpOAtlE+nDjhb9me4wx7qfSj9Lov4063vfH/SK60xeJACUXC0EYQXRwFypd cBzonGDhbC4pHs/S064HkEiNZdiuWUR4khF0/i2urOpc31wuVfm3Y+yJUwsH3uh4rw4Q on/PbHv98Jx1XM9nrwBDjYl2DSF1IYWnApurSeQiirWdNZ10nuxDvMoT2v8Te4ZWd+6v ZWSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzsQFoO/L5KNr5Z/8GrZKWhnbXlno5uJX7g9SDZAuJ1SRqze0ti 7fUOIe5WjkgqhGBglDbitB9Tf3uq1JRziGG7bH2RDwpGDS4Axa3fx6RV4Jw6qfZyo9JOplWw8Wc MPymjfJWU
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu4Cc0rA3mjWRMqsvTTvCmY7FPMDUXxyakvVn45kskr6HR5TLZPJZGSgL4wAFs 5HybMYf3kZqQ+COqvXbFOR5juD/jkDZ29/IF/MfR5BFgx0qUqWp5xNwkHFB0abSOwVDOhQ12U+I pNr3pmRs6IYdmnk7zIvbC24lQDUjhvEokoFkVe5UQF0NcJOYk7/H/JtDgj7pXkQh6hqpvIzpQNF ZiJM+qV2E6Krm4i61nKjeRxYUgke95sEGN/icpS5GI0zTQRUwRdavf03Hj7cl8iDxH28aPUfpqH G3uUuz1JsjyomtuxhobVn/ylSe8K8xSBTXd/jZeR5fqqIyuf+ZAi3o/yac7Ruf4T89YK0LS8hL1 S2svhAwQrhl7DtyockkaLAVK/GFOUrTHxS1/VR+y0RodiTRmO+ZlCUFvr+sta5Oa8MBiNI4xibY c5aPezSL6NI5onOvp7CozXIb5aJf2muakF6kcE9w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGfS8+kKmqmhlx6t1cFrJjDQm1JAVCk9iHG6hDKEWduZeETgi12jEFg2/sTq+/Y75quxi5Odw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:88ce:0:b0:77f:4a83:8f9 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7ae1c767baemr1614590b3a.2.1762303974373; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com. [209.85.214.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-7acd32473a5sm4297603b3a.12.2025.11.04.16.52.53 for <wgchairs@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:52:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-294fc62d7f4so59126115ad.2 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:52:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d584:b0:294:fcae:826 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2962ae9e353mr20652725ad.59.1762303973428; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:52:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8B3EBD56-73C1-7146-87B6-60951F139D54@hxcore.ol>
In-Reply-To: <8B3EBD56-73C1-7146-87B6-60951F139D54@hxcore.ol>
From: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 19:52:37 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAGBSGjqsCwxGAB8K0KEr4o+=4BF25Vo9RnK-ensSA+ANpwASoQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bnLRrw4dAIRo_7XO2NH68xKv3lh82JKGbNeHQnV5B2BpN18MbONoXiAP7c
Message-ID: <CAGBSGjqsCwxGAB8K0KEr4o+=4BF25Vo9RnK-ensSA+ANpwASoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed sliders for WG meetings should have a more prominent placement
To: "ned.smith.ietf@gmail.com" <ned.smith.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000052971a0642ce5e62"
Message-ID-Hash: OHXSNO4SFESZRDCVRV7YSEFEIUNOLQJY
X-Message-ID-Hash: OHXSNO4SFESZRDCVRV7YSEFEIUNOLQJY
X-MailFrom: aaron@parecki.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-wgchairs.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, Jon Geater <jon.geater=40datatrails.ai@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/C4FzVHOJzvo-dj2LMucr4gXTFqc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:wgchairs-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-leave@ietf.org>
I also agree the proposed slides should appear in the Slides section. On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 12:17 PM ned.smith.ietf@gmail.com < ned.smith.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on the UX observation > > On 11/3/25, 5:45 AM, "Bob Hinden" <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Nov 3, 2025, at 7:10 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jon > > I've never seen that, but that's because I always click approve on the > email and I never get to the state you are in. > > > Same for me. > > Bob > > > tim > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:06 AM Jon Geater <jon.geater= > 40datatrails.ai@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Does anyone else find this UX super confusing? When new slides are > proposed we get an email (great, I like that!) but if you’re going through > all the meeting prep in DataTracker the proposed slides are hidden away > right at the bottom of the page underneath quite boilerplate-y material. > > Do other people also think it’s worth raising a ticket to the tools team > for this? I would imagine the proposed slides should be immediately after > the accepted ones. Screenshot below. > > Jon > > <image.png> > > >
- Proposed sliders for WG meetings should have a mo… Jon Geater
- Re: Proposed sliders for WG meetings should have … Tim Wicinski
- Re: Proposed sliders for WG meetings should have … Bob Hinden
- Re: Proposed sliders for WG meetings should have … ned.smith.ietf@gmail.com
- Re: Proposed sliders for WG meetings should have … Aaron Parecki