Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 18:26 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF5812014F for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqmQ_UqqDoZq for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0FB12014E for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id n134so3366892lfn.11 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t68RrT3pZRGDE9ePjIqAkxdeHE2GuJZiPtN2bzOGNVk=; b=NqBqwB/zP1FFjhD6ywJn/WawXb7lkXGQgrNfWb+RcXjhRDGb91sKAgL+lQLmy7AG2V wKR1Pc8uoi5vohDU/S6fI3PolmgbTVNRU0JKMfsSwd4/SHTHGawx3DDS4RX9E+m2xl7M 4jvzquF/T0tE9xp0hZXCF9yPX6s3QG5G3IjvDHkzFCFuxRJmJ9QbKgEkxdGmkctrAhw0 PJrXvyQAdqpFXXwWlOpF/OMVpUVLUa8ObOeOAR4KY67XrJW1BG5HrMxaQPG6Y6k2XEGF N822Jz+QpU0/WLYUFwcZzZIbnE++L2BfMK5i1IXWPN8cSccL1fzL7P4MCclg9vV30yip U56w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t68RrT3pZRGDE9ePjIqAkxdeHE2GuJZiPtN2bzOGNVk=; b=s+dp9uyeci1aqU0B5NAZnOAvDpipPW0p4bMkPPR7NS4WjRET42EmzDKOYADR+oVUZf Chs2eoeLb0sMnl/BwW7waa1ca0I51nvAZrBSUR+AckzqZwAaWXU/OrfodPGEL7eFDfb9 5WT55M/2I1CUkGDiVAkrYj7jBV9vyzqnxiMl7nZSkTeUhb76TfJiXIiLub2iu9pK+gOI +Yh/D5WsfndAkjiL6F7Ip1LCQoug2Vp1OV4rpvOC8e6DwSuQ2cXmc8Sq8twpMcQXVXZV u8JMa85EUnYxc9Z5Wwv0EioNYd0Hs3uoWwi+aNBT7unr1kwyjNVw0zNo+PzsJ6C23LDs P76w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJMd7Y6vaIx9pWH524Q/MrmmrdfhdpmPFGCGGJo1nOOpF/MtDn XYkkJKHNdiYXwBtMkr/+gceNjjxv3/FbofIgAQA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzZrMOJf28XV/5jxkKpkaiQA32rZyeVV6W/CPNFx3I8tN1+zBxm4I7vX2g0I7XCxsOO+K4Wk+bJWva7pRNhAPI=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:4c55:: with SMTP id z82mr17219766lfa.68.1558031210388; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org> <22493.1557605363@localhost> <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com> <20190514011432.bdvcznxca2nvd4ar@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b3e5dafc-50ff-09ef-066a-52c9ba11e563@pi.nu> <6A39D1BB-7F81-4B77-B7A8-8D9EAC142C02@gmail.com> <BE4D4204-6071-459C-AC09-97ED35D17D9E@viagenie.ca> <4AC557B0-67B9-442B-824D-F522703AEB72@akamai.com> <CD86E244-47DA-4525-BB44-0F1C293CE0D0@cisco.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E1893EC@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <ybly336par7.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363056B432@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363056B432@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:26:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN4vDjDFPHgtZCWEiVRZ5XJ1jDp-o5gMUeW9eR+i3WcaLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
To: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d8245b05890568fb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/CQDLeMNoQsEDoAD89eE_mWxECLE>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 18:26:56 -0000
+1 On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:09 PM Black, David <David.Black@dell.com> wrote: > > What if we had per-topic/area group-tables? > > That would be a good move, perhaps for just the first part of the > reception.. > > Thanks, --David > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: WGChairs <wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Wes Hardaker > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 1:31 PM > > To: STARK, BARBARA H > > Cc: 'Working Group Chairs' > > Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs > > > > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > > > "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> writes: > > > > > The email that told us the newcomers reception would be discontinued > > > said this was because the speed-mentoring session was perceived as > > > being far more valuable/useful and it wasn't necessary to have > > > both. > > > > Yes, and no to the above. Functionally, it was serving two > > purposes: 1) the original purpose: allowing newcomers to meet up with > > chairs and ADs, 2) its transformed purpose: allowing chairs and ADs to > > meet up with chairs and ADs. > > > > It's intended original purpose was #1, and it seems the consensus is > > that #2 is what everyone is saying they're missing with lots of points > > about what the general reception can't be used. However, the problem > > that #1 wasn't meeting it's purpose is mostly unrelated to the > > quick-connections session. The purpose was still not being met, > > regardless. > > > > Here's a turn around question for the crowd: what would it take to make > > the general reception a viable spot to meet and serve the purpose of a > > pre-meeting meet-and-greet with people you need to talk with? What > > could be done other than "throw out everyone I don't need to talk to", > > which I don't think is a viable solution. If it's too loud, what could > > we do? If it's too popular, what if we removed food/drink for the first > > hour (so only the dedicated showed up)? What if we held it in a bigger > > room? What if we had per-topic/area group-tables? What *would* work? > > > > -- > > Wes Hardaker > > USC/ISI > >
- Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105 Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Gorry (erg)
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Linda Dunbar
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Black, David
- reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Carsten Bormann
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Jeffrey Haas
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- RE: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Stewart Bryant
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Loa Andersson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Bob Hinden
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Marc Blanchet
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Salz, Rich
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Pete Resnick
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker