Re: [EXTERNAL] Scheduling Tool

Sean Turner <> Thu, 11 March 2021 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD46F3A0C1C for <>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rq9yzmLCSg6y for <>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506C93A0C18 for <>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id f12so2264664qtq.4 for <>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Ja+Y1sRgt6+g4sug6krxFMyOJjXjsTHpQpTmR3ya2Po=; b=O9BehJFpQWXrvOSYxtQqBbcQL881c2FY+f+pIRbAxwiIGK8mIHUffDsGiq0SE2IzVA HltLI9qAAge0rqfpXsboKktdbzp8Xax3ydyq8sHPNnVB2s2eiD+dUFyU5dKH4YIm5Lih nMoeCG2udvjqim4wI7RK5tZS3BTGWGPCejyUE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Ja+Y1sRgt6+g4sug6krxFMyOJjXjsTHpQpTmR3ya2Po=; b=aWjLJQRsSgthQ/fkGxmmwv1GTfmixf+3NPQOuEQO44aaREuP75QIZLBamD2g+dcv8I vbnBoHeK7GSDsPzB6pnYsE++D53pAnFTclYPyMjxP+ewEKKhlLyQTbDFdJC6v85Cc87h DoZqwaIVzEFuQJ82mEMGgX3Tq76swpNfMUeEL+EWopjq9RBPQtAGu6VLH6HiyyFfQnw/ rGvKhjuoyZ7Qjtx+skHlsIaLCz70jrftqrtgHKo/gCuxaebIyk7DG+0/fYEmf3UVgau8 LOZxQ/TSwH1uYRPDJREsJAl+LYRnK5pNIXB4VDLGxyq+0dzHT/l/aywqN92KPEZeVg7j gOSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ibm8P1TmLRlpuLxvDPMYQe/eyN3N30E9r2DY5NxWm/GuwVgQQ CtudQCPtree3ezh8To0A2jeuUA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3Qtf+xKi/0X7sfQ/hvVIiJRXxB86ZtOQPAd+Yvp+MGTnVPlYxB3qoNY9TdipF197v79QPEw==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:3886:: with SMTP id k6mr7824472qte.167.1615497150814; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id a2sm2566795qtj.76.2021. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:12:30 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.\))
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Scheduling Tool
From: Sean Turner <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:12:29 -0500
Cc: "" <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <>
To: Glenn Deen <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:12:34 -0000

> On Mar 11, 2021, at 12:27, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal) <> wrote:
> ´╗┐On 3/11/21, 8:52 AM, "WGChairs on behalf of Sean Turner" < on behalf of> wrote:
>    Apologies if this has been asked before, I have not done an exhaustive search of the WG Chair's list.
>    When scheduling meetings for MLS, I have used Google Forms and for TLS I have often used Doodle. I get complaints each time I use one of these for various reasons. I also say some poo-pooing of Doodle in some Meetecho session I was in. What are we supposed to use that is privacy friendly but also not supporting consolidation that actually works?  I have heard of;!!PIZeeW5wscynRQ!6kUZm7HPYcL8nxnTOIArtksHGdgwsvgE7Rntpak62NJzbM8WlBDYV-SVKE6Wn69V$  do others use it?
> [GD] for what it's worth - I've been using Doodle without complaints from ADD members.   How is Framate one better privacywise than doodle?  It says it requires Javascript and cookies to be active.
> -glenn

Honestly, I do not know. I am wondering how much to contort to address these suggestions.

I am loathe to do something special for IETF when everybody else I interact with uses something else.