IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irsg] problem with recent drafts on tools.ietf.org? {35440727}

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 05 March 2021 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCF13A25F2 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 06:36:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VwMr-FVkLX2N for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 06:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43BFC3A25F1 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 06:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unformal.local ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 125EaH7X071843 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:36:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1614954978; bh=P1EWdSgtgtBdY7Fjz7SWryVUO4Nn+bUCJntg+NPZAf8=; h=To:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=eGW+pNb8gTxakh0gGjuotYUt712j5F1DAN9MYMpanwMoDCGXn4DtC5NFDFQmrUXkS df9IVeM4Ff2qHT1SHH9kQc8Ohg/OLGfINZiccW1jQLFVIxd1dXo0MmhnC98PgOtHQs BJkSLQrvhVOU4K9WzafjYhWuMdVi5ImlTVDZ79vI=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.local
To: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <35440727.JitbitHelpdesk.46704.0bb5cf6e-5ee4-475f-a405-1f97b826a0a9@jitbit.com> <fcb1efac-931e-3c68-21f6-954c053c99e3@labn.net> <6C47036A-F803-4E77-A5A9-550C6E16C4C8@gmail.com> <331C7083-E6E8-4E5B-96F9-04D8724F70C7@gigix.net> <83F05A13-7785-4868-A9B3-59A27C941B79@gmail.com> <3791BB35-B715-4C5D-84E1-F127075528D9@tzi.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [irsg] problem with recent drafts on tools.ietf.org? {35440727}
Message-ID: <96af6f4f-a08e-c92b-9eb1-d653e2f5232f@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 08:36:12 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3791BB35-B715-4C5D-84E1-F127075528D9@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/E23zoPibJSqlmyEXJnRsTq-AcqI>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:36:22 -0000

Please drop notes to the tools-discuss list or directly to me as you 
think of things. I'd like for you to catch them as you see you need them.

Carsten's idea of something more structured is a good one, and I hope to 
build on it.

And, yes, we're dealing with the meeting and more, so please be patient 
if you don't see an immediate response.

I think we can take this as an opportunity to constructively assess 
where some near-term efforts would he helpful. Try to keep that 
perspective in mind as you capture things to comment on.

RjS

On 3/5/21 2:51 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2021-03-05, at 09:39, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To whom do we send a list of the tools resources that we use?
> We could start a discussion thread on tools-discuss.
>
> But maybe we want to give the Tools Team (which is certainly drowned at the moment because of IETF110) some time to organize a more structured solicitation of requirements.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email