Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Tue, 03 September 2024 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B009C151980 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 23:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9d_AFhGxx2l for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 23:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC13C151552 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 23:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1725345298; bh=cd3CF/tERSbzgVY7C5LGljb6WlOVSK80Ih1PlOYFNvw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=CYy7PtV4tc/Fo636hIuYHJKrr/9iocb5qyk3ZLzrpz7heaBmlba3mgDNAhhHm/2it sCUm/qAunfkXk1BRR3cJ3c3fLshfRuNAuARjOcXT23dLN6u7XwI7MBaurmVS2S8VJe Z0zYlh9qL9apnDd4yqEwWu4KovFUajr+6WpD3kRE=
Received: from [IPV6:2a02:1210:2c9b:e200:e017:2c55:fae7:4fd8] (0.1.2.1.2.0.a.2.dynamic.cust.swisscom.net [IPv6:2a02:1210:2c9b:e200:e017:2c55:fae7:4fd8] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22ubuntu3) with ESMTPSA id 4836Yurl3102968 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:34:57 +0200
Message-ID: <91b0663e-fa4e-4b26-bd67-94ff5848b39e@lear.ch>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 08:34:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <7487E6AA-A8BE-42A9-9E80-F85C49ABF026@ietf.org> <CAHbuEH72xCnM6_F+A+jP3nPkNY2sHa_zG4Skbhdu40SBgXSdcA@mail.gmail.com> <cf22ba70-330a-a912-f838-3010fa423f6e@nohats.ca> <dc4b8bba-7f4d-47a1-9376-bf91a9f03b64@lear.ch> <75730386-05fc-4e71-abed-1d4a6c33b4c2@bogus.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Autocrypt: addr=lear@lear.ch; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNGUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAbGVhci5jaD7CwI4EEwECADgCGwMCHgECF4AWIQSY0L2Q Rh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6M8KI B/46pFrJX+4Ockl2fHR303ais9Lyx8jv6mXKKOr8WR0UYcJ0syQrhaaZNG1VV98tYQHHK9F5 y7hH4YCsrr3odZ6zoavnx5X1X/2xw8y732f/irVoOOkYLid9IGPxa2e2nYXCZpde5/yvv3we XVE4mG4dEAD5T8iKS4Hz/3fKGJQ15o79Jv92HgC7RpCt0WaiQ0b6acP3PuwjDJzJzLFZzb7j IiB3izxQESSWE1GNRmoAK/k0gW6kmx1/87tQENrK+3Nn4CJSFQWF6entLnY7UeVm95wbMQkJ evwddDWUO2huDbmZnmxgKXGzSSpuNq7n8ICAOlbt0HfdJAZQfy25bwvezsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0 WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Macj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGo HOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExdd qV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcYY/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5c HUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU+tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypu cGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkF AlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c62pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHS iXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnXHXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGw f2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycjPAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoA MjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPFOmDhJSmH55HLAky2Mlmq JYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNR zGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
In-Reply-To: <75730386-05fc-4e71-abed-1d4a6c33b4c2@bogus.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------OZdNlFmbvP7xBlG7DNCzHTAA"
Message-ID-Hash: BI45HJIIPWYH5UK6CPKUKV4BBQIJYPZ4
X-Message-ID-Hash: BI45HJIIPWYH5UK6CPKUKV4BBQIJYPZ4
X-MailFrom: lear@lear.ch
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-wgchairs.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: wgchairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/HNwEda8kY11NDjug7vT4lFg6WMQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:wgchairs-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-leave@ietf.org>

My point:

It's better to have one meeting rather than two.  That is what the human 
brain is wired for.  When the chat really gets going, I will bet you 
that those people paying attention to the chat are missing at least some 
of what is being said at the microphone. People fly great distances to 
participate in these meetings, and so paying attention to the meeting in 
the room is a matter of courtesy.  And those of us who do often miss 
what is being written in the chats.  Ergo two meetings.

That said, I'm not suggesting that there's no purpose for the chat 
interface, and as I and others wrote, a very chatty chat room is a 
signal to the chairs that a topic may need more discussion time.

Eliot