Re: problem with recent drafts on tools.ietf.org? {35440727}

[Fred Baker <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for clearing this up. I obviously forr, and repeated, some bad data.

I don’t blame you for discounting IETF lists. I’m back on it now, but dropped ietf@ after the Buenos Aires meeting. The meetings committee got a load of crap on that list for quite some time, and I had had enough.

Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...

> On Mar 10, 2021, at 3:37 AM, David Noveck <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> I believe it is the IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors. 
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 6:17 AM Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> This is most disturbing.
>> 
>> Who is Jay’s boss?
>> 
>> Stewart
>> 
>> > On 10 Mar 2021, at 11:02, Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hi Fred,
>> > 
>> > Someone alerted me to this.  I don't read any IETF lists any more, so
>> > needed the nudge:
>> > 
>> > On 2021-03-04 20:15, Fred Baker wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >>> On Mar 3, 2021, at 3:54 PM, Lou Berger <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>> Well this is a troubling response -- does anyone know if there's
>> >>> plans for tools.ietf.org? I would have thought that some thought
>> >>> would be given to this and maybe some announcement made to the
>> >>> IETF. Did I miss it??? Are we just destined to the whims of bit
>> >>> rot?
>> >> 
>> >> I think there was an announcement that Henrik was leaving, and I
>> >> certainly knew that there was a conflict between him and DMS/Glen's
>> >> work.
>> > 
>> > There has been no conflict between me and AMS/Glen, none at all.  There
>> > has been a great deal of conflict with the way the LLC Board and Jay
>> > has been running things and what they have put me through, and I'm deeply
>> > unhappy with them, but not at all with AMS or Glen.
>> > 
>> > The latest incident was with Jay at the beginning of February, after
>> > the end of my contract but at a time when I was still committed to
>> > maintaining tools.ietf.org as I have been doing it.  That February
>> > encounter did however completely zap my motivation for keeping
>> > tools.ietf.org up, and I now just want to be able to get completely
>> > away from it.
>> > 
>> > It used to give me great pleasure, thanks to the appreciation of all
>> > the good people in the IETF community, but now after the latest Jay
>> > incident it only reminds me of the pain of last year.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Best regards,
>> > 
>> >       Henrik
>> > 
>> >> What might be nice wold be if people could somehow advise the
>> >> LLC that they use some specific tool, and would like to see it ported
>> >> into the AMS toolset. I would include the ability to subscribe to a
>> >> meeting calendar attached to or derived from derived from the IETF
>> >> Agenda. I use the "tools style" calendar and subscribe to it - in
>> >> large part because I keep all of my calendars in one tool and have
>> >> calendars that are unrelated to the IETF, so the ability to subscribe
>> >> to a calendar that lists a subset of the meetings at a given IETF
>> >> meeting is very useful to me.
>> >> 
>> >> For clarity, I am attaching what my calendar looks like fr the week
>> >> of IETF 110, and includes IETF meetings, ICANN's prep week for ICANN
>> >> 070, and some work in the ITU, in addition to personal events. If I
>> >> have a complaint in that, it is that ICANN and ITU don't seem to see
>> >> the value of subscribing to a calendar, but rather send out events -
>> >> when then become outdated as time goes on. I would not want IETF to
>> >> become deficient in that respect. 
>> > 
>>