Re: [irsg] Re: agenda topics for IETF 124 Working Group chairs forum

[Mirja Kuehlewind <[e-mail]>]

Hi MCR,

while liaison tools efforts, work on the bis documents as wells as work on further information updates e.g. on chairs.ietf.org are continuing, we were not planning for another session at the chairs lunch. Do you have specific things you like more information on?

Mirja



On 14.10.25, 16:34, "Michael Richardson" <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:




Karen ODonoghue <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> If anyone has any topics they would like to discuss at the IETF 124
> Working Group Chairs Forum during our regular Wednesday lunch slot,
> please let Rich and I know. These can be either topics you want to
> hear about (and we'll see about getting the right people in the room)
> or topics for which you want to lead the discussion.


1. I've been trained to look for WG chairs lunch content at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/emodir/meetings/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/emodir/meetings/>
I see the link pointing me at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/eodir/meetings/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/eodir/meetings/>
Thank you... I didn't see that link at first glance...


2. I don't feel like we finished/concluded on Liason statements.


3. what started at 122 with my 2-minute "dropbox" command, and then
Martin did some more github stuff at 123.
I was surprised at 122 and 123 with how much of this seemed new to
chairs. I think that chairs need to be experts at the tools that
we ask authors to use, because chairs will need to be available to help
unstick things.


This comes to what kind of *ongoing* (re)training of WG chairs should be
occuring, and how to do this?


--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide