IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Tue, 03 September 2024 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@staff.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813AAC18DBBC for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFP5ZOycPVvD for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4FD2C18DB87 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 14:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-533496017f8so7752008e87.0 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1725397423; x=1726002223; darn=ietf.org; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6g6J0sklP43O9uLsy/4Bks8nyFWuMYK3Bm1wjSasNi0=; b=ZoQwUFPk5aejP458SxMBg5Mc8euf0+qokvXg/MxBDMgjSwgPiJ9pGdv03fbQl0KzRm uhd8pLrph8oxGCksgy42+k396UhtW3n5D/QtZvTI2tg6FeZMIyMQjw3HrxWvfKQ12HZX EhF43Gdc/7ThLfkpWcDq4XZWGn+UuueYEn6wyc7YwoCu557CUbchhH5bpPTIKkT371Yt Jrj5WZ+nDwYQBoyQKCP8si/6ixDAdGXVytjlK/997n0jgPH+i3zJgbBvRFrGeO6WBFqz rvId2Yi16TvXrqR/zZkTzK4tlfIHJGcDk3we7RUtK56EtNnZW+WEwKayVNE2ev6aowDp HpyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725397423; x=1726002223; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6g6J0sklP43O9uLsy/4Bks8nyFWuMYK3Bm1wjSasNi0=; b=CrmMTT2NyOIINd8lCsrQfYEd/qmwtvEb/b3laM+7zhXq3pnYD3Qgrjnl0/S6C751hb VRr2FaAgQLFX+AXxQh2dCTi1kG6ZPOAQcAge6rWguyI4M9sCvI1PSkYd76mN3JNrVfM+ rygJyO+ykMihKaTMC800Z8EFzhyn+hGBvim/VFC2gDFDmDS3CSFA7TjPHi6HE4EWXA8g Sjx3c5vJm/3OZJJ5oPIn+/QhLEz0BXwsatXgUOlSnSelbZSIwq07IPKk9PISZydqRQQE Plhlsv4P613DkAbnvpGc9OEL41uffNC0Pfog41KPF85zVfcnxroK+b1KVK1ZzNxN7X6M EYQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw8FKJXoorimy1dmItnhV7hiCftVzZEbTvbYXp39bQ8C8YPrT8w RnPkbym8TkfbABm34CF938QDGMnVL8r47IHsbN4EQ2DS/jgOwQImHSe96hde5i2rSRiK9uiFCZu B0ns=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGBVT8UeXVuIAZ/3By1LQ4fCeZRK46Y8emN7xBhCme9WDm0DaTqf+pXJkNf/XFfgCEy9WSLVQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:104f:b0:52e:9c0a:3522 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53546b6941amr10246179e87.44.1725397422607; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([92.27.125.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c24eaf7a32sm4052567a12.67.2024.09.03.14.03.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-986572A6-58D5-4CDC-826F-8A3822B08657"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 22:03:31 +0100
Message-Id: <40D291AB-5706-4377-A098-D11E6E12F69A@ietf.org>
References: <CAGgd1Of=8mAeG4tBn+7fc+phHJA8PwZK3y+KBZz+hyEZ-P2qeQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGgd1Of=8mAeG4tBn+7fc+phHJA8PwZK3y+KBZz+hyEZ-P2qeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21G93)
Message-ID-Hash: LN6RGQEHXQEC6BKN7GP3MOZYZUKYHDYP
X-Message-ID-Hash: LN6RGQEHXQEC6BKN7GP3MOZYZUKYHDYP
X-MailFrom: jay@staff.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-wgchairs.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: wgchairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/LFhquRrQYhkjLYTtqWhF5p-Uoug>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:wgchairs-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Deb

On 3 Sep 2024, at 21:06, Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> wrote:


I went and looked at the comments on the last question (10 pages of comments) and only two/three of them were about the in-session chat. Seems like most people (who answered the survey) didn't think this was worth listing as an issue. 

Free text comments are most useful when read not counted. If we want meaningful empirical data then I can ask specific questions in a future post-meeting survey. 

Jay

-- 
Jay Daley 
IETF Executive Director

For what it is worth, when I post minutes, I usually go through the chat log to pick up comments that were made there.  As chairs, we may need to go back to chat monitors (I was going to say jabber scribes, duh!). 

Many more comments on:  visas, COVID, food, and the cost of staying in Vancouver.  A handful of comments on the network and Meetecho issues. 

Deb

On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:12 PM Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote:
Hi all

There were a number of aspects to the feedback in the post-IETF 120 meeting survey that are worth highlighting and updating you on.

1.  Comments that the in-session chat is a distraction. This is one we will monitor and possibly ask specific questions about in the next post-meeting survey.  There was a suggestion of explicit pauses in sessions to allow people, particularly presenters, to catch up with the chat but I have no idea how practical that is.

2.  Comments about managing slides and presentations, that we will pass on to Meetecho.

3.  Comments about the use of screen space in rooms and how that can be improved.  The meetings operations team are reviewing this and we’ll see what improvements we can make.

As a reminder, the survey dashboard is at [1] and the last question, Q27, has the free form comments.

cheers
Jay


[1]  https://ietf.co1.qualtrics.com/results/public/aWV0Zi1VUl8zT3laRG9JQWxidUkxZ0otNjZjMzQwNWI4ZjhlYTQwMDA4Nzg5MjNi#/pages/Page_1fe9399e-cacb-4063-af49-ee1340c57993" rel="noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">https://ietf.co1.qualtrics.com/results/public/aWV0Zi1VUl8zT3laRG9JQWxidUkxZ0otNjZjMzQwNWI4ZjhlYTQwMDA4Nzg5MjNi#/pages/Page_1fe9399e-cacb-4063-af49-ee1340c57993

--
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status