Re: Closing the queue

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 30 July 2021 22:56 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BAT5Nv4vu0R9cVowK_vunHRuA86jQqdbjtLvQ5x6zuwN7g@mail.gmail.com> <124013E8-300D-4CD4-9E36-9D166716BFE0@gmail.com> <CAFU7BAS7AtgCgDjJe0iFvOtr94eRfLmMjmQgHnQUSS3OYKLx1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BAS7AtgCgDjJe0iFvOtr94eRfLmMjmQgHnQUSS3OYKLx1w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 17:56:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eS_MtnkKuGpkvLM0nwobQ7hryO4mEnMh4pcbZhvAgsQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Closing the queue
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000088a4f805c85f2124"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/MsXjik_XoYZFc75LgJWSjbwBMxY>
Precedence: list

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 5:25 PM Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 6:33 AM Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest that one say “I’m closing the queue after <nam>”, and
> have a way to tell meet echo that it should stop putting new people in the
> queue.
>
> Actually I'd say that "hard lock" might be suboptimal - sometimes we
> might still want people joining after the queue is closed as an
> exception - like an AD making comments etc. In real life even after
> the queue is closed people still can jump to the mic to respond to
> comments etc.
>

I've been wrong before, but I THOUGHT sending audio and/or video was also
on the honor system - I think I've been able to turn on at least audio and
break in for at least comments before the session starts, without queuing.
Am I missing something?

Best,

Spencer


> Personally I'd be very happy if I can click on "closing the queue in
> 15 secs" and the queue section goes, for example, orange  and the
> title says "QUEUE: CLOSING". After 15 sec it goes red(*) and marked as
> CLOSED.
> As a result it's clearly visible for the participants that it's closed
> and for the chairs that they need to re-open before/during the next
> talk, white there is still possible to join it.
>
> (*) color examples are chosen randomly and might not accommodate
> color-blind cases.
>
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > > On Jul 29, 2021, at 6:58 PM, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > While I'm very happy with Meetecho (wow, I've just managed to chair a
> > > session single-handed!), there is one missing feature which would make
> > > me very happy.
> > >
> > > Wouldn't it be great if we have a button to mark the queue "closed"?
> > > It might be just me but I really, really hate interrupting people just
> > > to say "I'm closing the queue after". Having smth like "The queue will
> > > be closed in 5..4..3..2..1" would be even better..
> > >
> > > Is there anyone else missing this feature? Or I'm just not aware of
> > > the best current practices in keeping the session on time?
> > >
> > > --
> > > SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
>
>

Closing the queue Jen Linkova
Re: Closing the queue tjw ietf
Re: Closing the queue Bob Hinden
Re: Closing the queue Alexey Melnikov
Re: [irsg] Closing the queue Carsten Bormann
Re: [irsg] Closing the queue Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Re: Closing the queue Fred Baker
Re: Closing the queue Jen Linkova
Re: Closing the queue Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Re: Closing the queue Jay Daley
Re: Closing the queue Carsten Bormann
Re: Closing the queue Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Re: Closing the queue Jen Linkova