Re: Draft "Convince your boss" note for IETF participants - follow up

Greg Wood <> Tue, 04 October 2022 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECEDC1524B4 for <>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.608
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kK4RDcRkcZp2 for <>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C45C1524B3 for <>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D02549D944D for <>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4TmXjvI6ZXFO for <>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35CB149D944B for <>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Greg Wood <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.\))
Subject: Re: Draft "Convince your boss" note for IETF participants - follow up
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 18:39:49 -0400
References: <>
To: WG Chairs <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 22:39:55 -0000


Thanks for all the feedback and really good discussion! I do want to note that this text is intended to be a starting point for adaption to a person’s particular situation so not expected to cover all cases. Hopefully it provides enough scaffolding to make it easier for those who are looking to build their own cases.

I’ve updated the template note based on the input with details below:

I’d be particularly interested from anyone who shares this with participants in their groups (perhaps folks who would like to come but don’t yet have support from their orgs) and, if so, I’d love to know whether they find it useful. 

Feel free to (have them) email directly with information about that.

Again, this is an experiment and it seems like there is interest, so developing other versions of this is definitely something we could work on.



Feedback on “Convince your boss”


Here is what I heard and tried to incorporate it (please let me know if I’ve missed something):

a) Provide more direct examples of how in-person interaction at the meeting would be useful

I’ve added some example text and also explanatory notes about how to use/augment it

b) include the case where the company is leading in a particular area

Included an option for someone authoring an I-D (though this may not fully cover the point)

c) Consider other modes of participation in addition to in-person participation at a meeting, particularly with in-person participation more difficult to get approved.

This note is intentionally tailored to in-person participation, but parallel notes for modes like online meetings and general IETF participation could be also developed. Since the question was raised, I do want to note that the general motivation for this effort is to promote IETF participation *generally* (mailing list contributions, etc.) so that is definitely something I’d like follow up on.

d) Convince the lawyers!

This is very an interesting point that I am not familiar enough with to suggest text. I am following up directly.

e) Will this lead to sales?

In general, this doesn’t seem to be a case that can/should be made directly for attending an IETF meeting.

f) provide examples of post-meeting reports

This seems like something that is generally company-specific in format and person-specific in terms of content, but if folks have previous (perhaps redacted) examples they could share as part of a library, that would be a great starting point.

> On 28, Sep2022, at 10:22, Greg Wood <> wrote:
> Hello!
> As an experiment, based on material some other technology conferences provide to (potential) participants, and at the suggestion received from an IETFer, we’ve created a draft “Convince Your Boss” note that might be used by someone seeking approval to attend an IETF meeting in-person:
> Any and all comments about whether this might be useful to you or participants in your groups, or suggestions about how it might be tuned to be more useful, would be most welcome — either on this list or directly to me.
> More broadly, it would be useful to know whether there is any specific information or material that would make it easier for IETF participants to participate in the IETF—not just meetings, but also (for example) devoting time to work in the IETF. Again, I’m happy to receive suggestions directly or on the list.
> Please let me know if I can provide more information or answer any questions.
> Thank you,
> -Greg
> --
> Greg Wood
> +1-703-625-3917