Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 07 May 2022 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057C1C147930 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2022 16:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVGdebFy4bZb for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2022 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DBBAC14F728 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 May 2022 16:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B6738C67; Sat, 7 May 2022 19:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BzA5VGSG82MG; Sat, 7 May 2022 19:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB06838C47; Sat, 7 May 2022 19:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1651965504; bh=LewxUPJMmwwr8Fl/0MMY8YstpjkZYwwrMmRaBeOuMB0=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=YqxR6ZuJ+4xvkQFlijo3X1kIjICcTUJ2sEY5BDaiSSZJihHQpqGT2ufQYkdCqGl+D V9/3rljc8PcYvtNz4b2r4PD/SgH3zxjA2p2sT9Fqp2ARf/lXYaLTdxovD3gNWwBqzu w5LzjeKy+Oxv+b8Ht7Z0WVdcQEFLFEaMA8zpmHo+DHzpgazhqIZf4Ux4wQ+UIlT8pe o/3oZ/pOsAuyd4mBF5nUGRuxsdo2/4w2fur0HPOH57I5lv9u7+5RW3984vqeQsVujB hzQUnDP9MVJNkLrhyaHic0+RbqYuE5NS60bZMH7eczq10Y4birIGj44GQVkLqzaUJJ UTVx/uKrs/qqQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B162A4; Sat, 7 May 2022 19:05:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@macmic.franken.de>, IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irsg] New document shepherd writeup
In-Reply-To: <2122113F-9BBC-4F26-BF9A-E5975AA9590F@macmic.franken.de>
References: <F4A44FCE-D31B-4FE8-9950-6C60CDD9DD36@eggert.org> <CAOW+2dsiHimBnUr1++Y+nq6r6oxA5jDa8sXM4g3k-vjXfDbPfQ@mail.gmail.com> <3EE82F27-F170-4E89-8491-B021C94E7B28@eggert.org> <69281967-83db-9ec3-26e1-67028a0cfa92@joelhalpern.com> <FAC35BA0-0955-4CCF-A278-D9BFF233C603@eggert.org> <E66933CF-1272-48D2-A8E7-BE1CE0859D3B@macmic.franken.de> <CALaySJJrvyeej_jkzByVZbcMp6Q=Yj=ZcA63kck1J2FT0_3k0g@mail.gmail.com> <015C8742-F6C4-4C78-89A5-D2F912231D7E@tzi.org> <15584.1651794856@localhost> <B7DD2B59-008A-45FD-BEA8-310D47897BE1@tzi.org> <8577.1651961152@localhost> <2122113F-9BBC-4F26-BF9A-E5975AA9590F@macmic.franken.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 19:05:03 -0400
Message-ID: <26382.1651964703@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/TDCNoBYup1Ngg1_hqAv6un4ux7w>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 23:05:12 -0000

Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@macmic.franken.de> wrote:
    >> We seem to be asking now:
    >> a) At workgroup adoption time
    >> b) At WGLC call time
    >> c) At Shepherd write-up time (sometimes the same as (b))
    >> I feel like I've been asked at AUTH48 time, but I'm not really sure of
    >that.

    > I (as an author and as a WG chair) am only aware of c). Where is a) and b)
    > formalized?

It's not.  It just happens in some WGs, possibly in error/mis-understanding.
Some WGs would like to know at adoption time if there is any IPR.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide