A quick poll about RFC 7221

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 12 September 2020 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641A43A0D90 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.805
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.805 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FQW-TEfZz5FQ for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF1303A0D8A for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08CKAJD9007506 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:10:19 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A25422044 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:10:19 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553CE22042 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:10:19 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([84.93.101.202]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08CKAIUG021717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:10:19 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: A quick poll about RFC 7221
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:10:17 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <00e001d68940$bc73db70$355b9250$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdaJQCZM6377JqPAR3WIAC2vUdH9mg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.101.202
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25662.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.496-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.496-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25662.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.496000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: sTjHn4eEbz7tORYLf8MUSLlRS/TbY0kClJrCiDwN/cE3o9CG0DlfVRXL d7d35YRWnVszd0IgUfLY37WE4vg/40KPluOEKT3/yJva9PWJqAkO9z+P2gwiBSNGK7UC7ElMrkl fRitl2cuFPr0S/jqQtSZggsZLYtHjSSOWVJeuO1A5f9Xw/xqKXcidYBYDjITptHIYYgLGbjZQSF bL1bvQASdET58jp62SC5Pk2+cP8URry15w521W1h6C3O7DgMD/3E28pxjqsgtYrnEH/0Urbk/kl vUXqehTcNMBYsFe1fd3sf4xkewsbzcodmCZGeH+Tf70HMUKRXM0BbzfNgPD+/U6UIg/Ep+LOeAx ECCt14TJ+RZp4bmn0A==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/UuHPlW9gr-kH2Kz2kOk9ODMYxI4>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:10:24 -0000

Hi WG chairs,

I'm just curious to see who has read RFC 7221.

Rather than clutter this list, I made a Doodle poll

https://doodle.com/poll/2w77cuh5h46vnkhk

Feel free to respond anonymously (e.g., give your name as "Anon 7" or some
such) if you like.

There's nothing more to this than wondering whether RFCs like 7221 get read.
I may come on later to whether this type of RFC is useful or could be made
more useful.

Thanks!

Adrian