IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: slow tools reaction

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 16 September 2021 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC8F3A2EF3 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BcDuA_aC8AZK for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C8A3A2F2D for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.34.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 18GGWNWF023729 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:32:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1631809944; bh=fVjtX6Q1wEFNqY0zYWWPP0ZHhh6b7s01JuekzG1zpEU=; h=To:References:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cdQQZEO+77CmIcrgIr6NCBMyEFy6XuH3kphL2eyFg7FH6bN+o1wa7bGNTEuLMkuEn Z+F/D8uN22D4wFBUmEc2Y5dfc2ESRWmYKerDv5qA7koCWzrINxa01ey9ZToeJPmtEG X47LE+rpN45BmUo99eXfvToxHKZG16o3Rgh+cbQo=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.34.206] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <BL0PR05MB56520AE3605328F120BAA8FED4DC9@BL0PR05MB5652.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR11MB2725C5B6FE3A2A7B95D5F976DFDC9@BYAPR11MB2725.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAF4+nEFZN+RBk9Ocnc4X2Xv4sTBKPpdxxWKg_nJfaLU5TOQGOQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210916041429.GI32645@kduck.mit.edu> <274E9172-D3B2-466E-9F02-BEF34DBB6A30@macmic.franken.de>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Reply-To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: slow tools reaction
Message-ID: <6528d62b-2625-4b70-1e98-0816bbb954c4@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:32:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <274E9172-D3B2-466E-9F02-BEF34DBB6A30@macmic.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/WaFtprMDhoEHGX2xM8fd4QzwYQg>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:32:40 -0000

On 9/16/21 10:51 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> On 16. Sep 2021, at 06:14, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I assume that everyone is referring to sites hosted under tools.ietf.org,
>> the old server that is slated for decommisioning.
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> thanks for the information.
>> I have seen slowness as well, but it does not really concern me much
>> because everything I regularly use is actually on the datatracker, and the
>> slowness only comes about because links (e.g., from google) have not
>> updated to point to datatracker directly instead of tools.
> What is the data tracker equivalent to
> https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org

Michael -

As I responded at 
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/-ofp2Lz7yH9ipPFGohAt_nztWYU>, 
we have active development projects to replace what's at 
xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org (see the author tools web services 
re-implementation and BibXML service RFPs at 
https://www.ietf.org/about/administration/rfps-and-contracts/). The 
BibXML contract is well underway, and we are addressing the author tools 
web service internally.

We plan to make these services available soon. We are very aware of the 
current issues with xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org.

All - please help move the remainder of this thread to tools-discuss@

>
> Best regards
> Michael
>> Also, tools-discuss is probably a better list at which to discuss any
>> issues.
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:13:55PM -0400, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>>> Me too...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Donald
>>> ===============================
>>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>>> 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
>>> d3e3e3@gmail.com
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 8:42 PM Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
>>> <mankamis=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>>> Yes , it’s been slow for me too .
>>>>
>>>> Mankamana
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: WGChairs <wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:33:32 PM
>>>> To: wgchairs@ietf.org <wgchairs@ietf.org>
>>>> Subject: slow tools reaction
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is it just me or have you also noticed that IETF tools have been quite slow recently?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Jeffrey
>>>>
>>>> Juniper Business Use Only
>>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email