Re: Draft "Convince your boss" note for IETF participants

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 28 September 2022 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9FCC15AE3E for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iF_dbwp8yRfv for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77319C15E3EA for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (x5271638e.dyn.telefonica.de [82.113.99.142]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992A81F455; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 21:55:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 87A621A0749; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 23:50:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Greg Wood <ghwood@staff.ietf.org>, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Draft "Convince your boss" note for IETF participants
In-reply-to: <DM4PR21MB34404B1D38C9C8D1A71296BFA3549@DM4PR21MB3440.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <475BFEC7-9F58-483F-85E9-84D535C4B73C@staff.ietf.org> <YzRmax4O2lxayqBA@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <DM4PR21MB34404B1D38C9C8D1A71296BFA3549@DM4PR21MB3440.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Dave Thaler <dthaler=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> message dated "Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:57:04 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 23:50:30 +0200
Message-ID: <216350.1664401830@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/YqLgLOzAIkCD7rCxP39oKzXsulU>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 21:56:07 -0000

Dave Thaler <dthaler=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Secondly, in this world of economic downturn, travel may be harder to
    > obtain funding for, and much of the current note would apply to virtual
    > attendance as well.  It doesn't really speak explicitly to the benefits
    > of in-person as compared to virtual, it is worded to compare in-person
    > to no participation at all.

To my mind, what we (the IETF community) really need is more people
contributing via email, reviews, and writing and prototyping running code.
I feel, btw, that in a few parts of the IETF this has significantly gone up
compared to ten years ago, but it might just be my perspective.... it's the
part of the IETF that I personally find the most rewarding.

The cost to the boss of having people spend *time* doing that is actually way
way way higher than the travel costs, but the cost comes in a less tangible way.

Once that kind of interaction is underway, the extra tangible cost of the
travel might be relatively acceptable.  (exploit the sunk-cost falacy here...)

So, I'd like to see a _convince your boss_ explanation that was tailored that way.

I am finding that we being asked to review and consider adopting many
documents for which there is no hope of ever seeing running code, even a
prototype.  I find it very sad, because often they are really good ideas, but
without a prototype or proof-of-concept, it's very hard to get enough
experience to convince people.



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-