IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Early review by the directorates

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 23 April 2021 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFB73A09E8 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lry7GHpBOTzi for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF973A09EA for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id j14-20020a17090a694eb0290152d92c205dso1846419pjm.0 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Ccqoz32XGRmRHQDrsML4nBdThYMId2zFUfb3LSmMbAM=; b=Ur8j5jOKJXKgG1UqY2R+IE9WPiqtE8LMqpkQt8Z+59hGenROsEDNsLs7UkAm6iYDiY 2VmzXo088JLIeh6evG+NOsctKvsSVl+Sjhrk8t99QQqfDjFGNgDLjitovD8tzn+PojDD eY+sY6d/rEnfOQjCxechVHRfYO10ywOsgaCr/mRbu2ao+MAYTrFmg0a4xZyRpkQ4f08c 9pNbXI42tXTkoBphZBAcT0++k4PhqaEKxvfGBooyvR9pw48ygE36/U4UMZZlZ3Ik5Mp6 KBS0+p1cGlvtj0btCGeKZqM9/01hP7eLpQDU8XP+izJndlCgsjYMacdFtUvF/mmFLNl/ 26vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Ccqoz32XGRmRHQDrsML4nBdThYMId2zFUfb3LSmMbAM=; b=BYhM5OEnUWwGUW9vGYvtc5DLoutJgmciJjFGY9Efx9kvHrpxzXY2oWMyjm9mHJo68J aU/1ZqcX8GkABT4nu/aPfjk9NHMkWaVWN54RbIwY5PO2Xs6NqcA6Tofg0mBg3XZi497L X2PUB3OabABTMHEIQ+uitmj52dcIKZJlhcPTSdfaexBBPckGl0ZKmBw4IC5ZrD5m8ifl IIx2T2/VNV4AGI3dA+nUAhx1tIbzNXEhYOGcaxszx8mFsYDF2BUBzdqQcaCp7qxJ8oku 8ya7HT1z7fMhMbTixBJ9q9LBP5lv1WK0B9OJQh7ui+2JPO+B60YgeIFVSTV2N5VvTlg3 qANA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PGDRZUcHwT0xwnn9I19a/nKHVzGK5HWZYife3UyHv1bOVMt3Y lXO4pPNKEHybSfAefwFHYrYsnjraOlI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCmynruqGmS9/l3X4V75KRBO88TJkW3SD91qga7wZAReHfXxM3lRYUklZrJXN5zqjHGxqrzw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1c0f:: with SMTP id oc15mr6604165pjb.228.1619210085854; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h9sm5520493pgl.67.2021.04.23.13.34.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Early review by the directorates
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:34:43 -0700
Message-Id: <66C9FD2C-B75F-47A5-AC01-096D8DF388F1@gmail.com>
References: <20210423204512.GA19004@pfrc.org>
Cc: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210423204512.GA19004@pfrc.org>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18D70)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/aG38AuIkyKrjb82nlY-35YgvRw4>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:34:52 -0000

I found extended reviews very useful, especially in pointing out cases that we (wg/area) consider obvious/given but is not necessarily so for others. In wg’s I co-chair -  I’m trying to always have these (early) reviews done before adoption and then before wglc.

Regards,
Jeff

> On Apr 23, 2021, at 13:22, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:41:31AM +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>> Dear WG chairs,
>> 
>> We simply want to remind you that many directorates/area review teams have specific knowledge and that you should never hesitate to ask for an ‘early review’, e.g., before the WGLC. Requesting a directorate review is not reserved for the Area Directors. ;-)
> 
> While not a directorate, if you have BFD questions, part of the BFD WG's
> charter is to help the other Working Groups review the use of BFD in your
> protocol/mechanism/app.  
> 
> A separate directorate list likely doesn't make sense since the active
> members would largely be the same subset as those who regularly participate
> in our small plumbing Working Group. :-)
> 
> -- Jeff 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email