Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announcement list
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 25 September 2021 21:18 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C343A23A2; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MId2L06EQJCs; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CFCF3A23A1; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id l6so8944871plh.9; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=636jeA8RQdlJbLIlj4cpipSBaT2VisgwpvnYbg9fHR0=; b=qn5k+EwFLIf2p/2BdOwVL8reCel6lJ7EWtD12HN+5OsoM76J4x/S/EBJDsvN48KEI9 58B6LepyH2DvNAvd17HnGCFz8yWbQ/YYKIppB6V9huVv9kL5Q6pXceNS4QJPaR0OmZt2 R/1ZkzxsEE/CJfRIXS0dvto+3Opwl0+gm6QVVwoYEGFrukR/kC6lm3RCfEgzZZ8zv8bc KLfnUIFka3VIYYOI3DRJtcjXQSclQSLmB1WXexCSVn0mtShu5dXv+i53wl/RyYW9Mv/8 hUa4DOzgXawNTvXJdyZkUw9az5+B3JlYYw5uW9JYnA/vRoliXEhjECErxXrPiI4T4PYw CEvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=636jeA8RQdlJbLIlj4cpipSBaT2VisgwpvnYbg9fHR0=; b=fYrREPon4VGyU9X1+Pm5MoA18OCa+hcoTBd/pdR/RgW9uI0jcHMjoG+zld8LbzF/rG VrK8sga26dUBb4XmOYmBEseJ2gbqo+YNKyJVxul0E2nfPCV5Lhy5usGkKGGMwQAYyHFG NV4mSBLHhoLJIMo7TSOkMPRLBi7fE0pxJScNDFhssH+Qn9fB2oALe1Aibkig1SVSUlbf oCHayNaD7gEkSkC4I0URvtkgggE/i8mrdKr7baHkRctwW6xcykH9JLd2mDiS5YBrvYI7 invVPs3rXZ7XPX4Ndo5I+Wxa1XlUg++tbbPapVqGY/bqnOUSHjGcJ3cN3IGsU6wZTM4n wUnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ds9xkfqFVgVgb3+LUSurUeBtrDQjPC+sUzsbZZQt4Av+J8rCr L96vGPo5WxvyoBYiPGGuS4gUJ1ztHux6ug==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxP0FguziGDULuBxVv9wQT/fLY/ukBjFgXOmVced9+6av3bWt+xXlgHcUWjY+2KoC5TlEADuA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7e4c:b0:13d:e735:5783 with SMTP id a12-20020a1709027e4c00b0013de7355783mr9234446pln.17.1632604682221; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n185sm13455872pfn.171.2021.09.25.14.17.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announcement list
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: 'Working Chairs' <wgchairs@ietf.org>, 'IETF' <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <71651F0B-0C5C-45D5-9780-926A25C9403E@ietf.org> <D148B2AA-E909-4C7A-BE68-65B104B2C338@gmail.com> <032a01d7b24d$0bb66e10$23234a30$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6470f650-22f3-b9da-0f70-c16a60fff523@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 10:17:55 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <032a01d7b24d$0bb66e10$23234a30$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/aY_OUTMz4RV1Y203Ac_9Pd3cbRg>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 21:18:06 -0000
Hi Adrian, On 26-Sep-21 09:36, Adrian Farrel wrote: > I promised I wouldn't get sucked in, but reading Bob's latest I find myself typing anyway. > >>> The IESG is therefore considering creating a new mailing list for >>> important organizational announcements only. We are hoping that a >>> subscription to a new low-volume mailing list will be acceptable to >>> IETF participants that find ietf-announce too noisy, and will help us >>> disseminate important news and announcements more widely and effectively. >>> >>> Here are the details about this proposal: >>> >>> * The name of the new mailing list is important-news. >> >> Suggest “ietf-important-news”, like “ietf-announce”. > > Can we avoid mailing list title inflation? > Just "ietf-news" should do the job. > >>> - The ietf-announce mailing list will continue to operate as-is. >>> >>> - All emails sent to important-news will be CC’ed to ietf-announce. > > Really? Why? This seems to totally deny the value of a new list. Possibly, but it's more friendly to people who are perfectly happy with the existing list. > It is also not very pleasant in the context of the "mandatory subscription" described below because now people will get two copies of emails. Not if you set the "no duplicates" option in mailman. I set it globally years ago and it improved my life considerably. >>> * Subscriptions >>> >>> - Every participant with a current Datatracker account will be >>> automatically subscribed to important-news. > > Please don't do that. It is inertia subscription. That is not nice in my opinion. I assume it would be an opt-out setting for new accounts. I think it's a reasonable strategy for existing accounts; how else will people know, because most of them aren't on ietf-announce? > How about sending each Datatracker account registered email address an email offering them "click here to subscribe"? Better, include a "click here to unsubscribe" at the end of the welcome message. >>> - Every participant creating a new Datatracker account will >>> automatically be subscribed to important-news. > > This can be handled with a check box during account creation so that the account holder has the option. ... to opt out. > >>> - Any important-news subscriber can unsubscribe at any time. > > Which is fine, but requires opt-out action which should not be the default. I disagree. This isn't like a commercial advertising exercise; it's trying to get people to actually be members of our community. Brian
- Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announcement l… IETF Chair
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Melchior Aelmans
- IETF calendar (was: Re: Proposal: an "important-n… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Bob Hinden
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Christian Huitema
- RE: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Salz, Rich
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… David Noveck
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Tim Wicinski
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Lucas Pardue
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… tom petch
- Re: [irsg] Proposal: an "important-news" IETF ann… Lars Eggert
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Lars Eggert
- Re: [irsg] Proposal: an "important-news" IETF ann… Lars Eggert
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Lars Eggert
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Lars Eggert
- RE: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… MORTON JR., AL
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Stephen Farrell
- RE: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Barry Leiba
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Alexey Melnikov
- RE: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… MORTON JR., AL
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Robert Sparks
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Michael Richardson
- RE: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Barry Leiba
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Barry Leiba
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… tom petch
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… tom petch
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Michael Richardson
- making upcoming calendar more useful Michael Richardson
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Jay Daley
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Barry Leiba
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Jay Daley
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Martin Thomson
- Why last calls matter more than ever [Re: Proposa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: making upcoming calendar more useful John C Klensin
- Re: making upcoming calendar more useful Warren Kumari
- Re: making upcoming calendar more useful Barry Leiba
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… tom petch
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Michael Richardson
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… tom petch
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Michael Richardson
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Robert Sparks
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… Michael Richardson
- Re: Proposal: an "important-news" IETF announceme… John C Klensin
- The links page [was: something else] Brian E Carpenter