IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey

Alexander Stein <ajstein.standards@gmail.com> Tue, 03 September 2024 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ajstein.standards@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CD0C14E515 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 16:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPE7nhIpcNMT for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 16:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x241.google.com (mail-oi1-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::241]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FD9FC18DBBA for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 16:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x241.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3df1a1f90f4so2236454b6e.2 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725404876; x=1726009676; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Sccg2YjyTh8e4jAef8aiYynU9Z+eetXvQlxwPkfGkyk=; b=P/sSnRwDUTG26MBeqtmPRwf90ZZkdx7jhB6D5S3a8k6JdPM2gvmqxvsxMxoFrYHmtk DNkOT5mwLWIkRKrNGJ8KeUVCdSNVxMrV46SxcRaLx2VY+rItjLfvXTjRmy/hYn7nMf3u 34SuSByxiz73Ujfw9B08v/eR+ScpgaLk2qLPVlPxcEMbjYr+/BUF6mQX7h95ExDfdMST lQaGeGW2nmn3VhT0ZIc5nHqGYq2qEXxZqkfK+zh4zLRbDB9jwLt9UXcOti4cT0h4hj2K XxsfaEWZ3N86DopqOLqvmMoEQSvv4vrDQf8nWzdd3QcIA++LkHcTNCuLrBH3/k2gyqlw Xr4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725404876; x=1726009676; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Sccg2YjyTh8e4jAef8aiYynU9Z+eetXvQlxwPkfGkyk=; b=Hr4clq2uPsEo4VtNQNdZH92TFDKr9uPsdXWhAUpp1HlNDqNCaGaJtTCTEIcNl8vlp8 7XjXTRH+rkiPnc8ybXRut5gld66JYs0HEDGp1ENgoSZxL0O+f+gzbtOasX2HpxptU9jE zz4qzhqj0NBEzeRYMpcoHl3h3no83VL1lGjoHTjGGzRAodm5IxUHKpdh9MUmd2+P8hFd ag/4wEpH9By7vJ08BMde+vks37k4a0C5mbhv9NLkIQRQsqOVgwQo00hzQNVosxQxsbFe G99vnPvrOt6iiX/Lu1Fh3PzzDyZ+sGAAdvfIXtiZrb7qMBBRbnIaeameOX2B1UIDMQQd VGFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz3VCW275FdwluIcePYA+OPy7gRXsprQQ/mzFJN1IdZCiXOONAo cXEvi81hJWpPLzhlN2Sncq/3ff2YsZlT+6ecKAlL5eBda4nufZEc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGWmUOOaSUzlI+cuon2MaO75REKEXO0Exf9wloDJWVH4uNpiyVMCcHqKGZtEaxG8BEgMC7LUQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2386:b0:3da:a032:24c5 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3df1c986d61mr15035132b6e.22.1725404875551; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.71.57.138] (static-198-54-135-53.cust.tzulo.com. [198.54.135.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-45682cacd02sm54138731cf.38.2024.09.03.16.07.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7a2410ce-0e61-45ee-9b94-b96f8900959a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 19:07:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Feedback from IETF 120 Vancouver post-meeting survey
To: Jon Geater <jon.geater=40datatrails.ai@dmarc.ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <7487E6AA-A8BE-42A9-9E80-F85C49ABF026@ietf.org> <CAHbuEH72xCnM6_F+A+jP3nPkNY2sHa_zG4Skbhdu40SBgXSdcA@mail.gmail.com> <cf22ba70-330a-a912-f838-3010fa423f6e@nohats.ca> <dc4b8bba-7f4d-47a1-9376-bf91a9f03b64@lear.ch> <CWXP265MB576672D6DC9775938A76EBD998922@CWXP265MB5766.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Alexander Stein <ajstein.standards@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CWXP265MB576672D6DC9775938A76EBD998922@CWXP265MB5766.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: 2SGEWM65C6SFKASS6QARAQALODWSMPL2
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2SGEWM65C6SFKASS6QARAQALODWSMPL2
X-MailFrom: ajstein.standards@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-wgchairs.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: wgchairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/at7yU0PLhEM55jw4WLc9xdlsEv0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:wgchairs-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-leave@ietf.org>

On 9/2/24 3:56 PM, Jon Geater wrote:

> Having +1s, links, follow-ups etc in chat is, IMO, _incredibly_ 
> efficient compared to everyone wanting their say and ‘me too’ and 
> clarification at the microphone.
>
> Capturing this in minutes, reflecting it during the meeting, and 
> monitoring it for distraction as has been said are key 
> responsibilities of chairs but I would not be in favour of making big 
> changes to the chat functionality.

I agree with Jon's sentiment here, and I will take to heart the 
recommendation of Jon and others (as a newer chair) to integrate 
relevant chat topics in Zulip into meeting minutes as is prudent. I did 
not know others did that mindfully.

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status