Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 19 September 2021 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2833A2EC1; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 08:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OqBT3H7LxYnD; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 08:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331E13A2EB9; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (host-188-15-16-83.business.telecomitalia.it [188.15.16.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HC9v02gw1z2xG9; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:03:56 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-24B8A66F-3652-4AC7-BEA2-1783EB44A76C"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <31A31E52-1C03-42D3-9ADA-1CC2FD2D11FB@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:03:55 +0200
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <CAD2E777-AAC2-485C-9082-6687A89B1C72@tzi.org>
References: <31A31E52-1C03-42D3-9ADA-1CC2FD2D11FB@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18H17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/fY1obnFqgabk592pXPx3K9buZYc>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 15:04:08 -0000

Asynchronous collaboration: git. Usually in combination with a website like gitlab or GitHub. (This is what the GitHub discussion in the IETF was about.) 
Asynchronous means not everyone had to be present at the same time. 

Synchronous collaboration: more variety. Today often hackmd/hedgedoc. Traces of Google docs and such. 
Synchronous means the focus is on groups that meet and edit at the same time, but of course hedgedoc can be “abused” for asynchronous collaboration. Since sessions end and synchronous and asynchronous phases may alternate, a good git interface would be a highly desirable element of a tool for synchronous collaboration. 

The more successful of either of these employ markdown as a storage/interchange format for textual information (text is code). 

Oh, I’m talking about how my more successful students work, but the pattern may be transferable to work in the IETF (and has been).

Sent from mobile, sorry for terse

> On 19. Sep 2021, at 07:42, Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 16 Sep 2021, at 18:32, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> 
>> the purpose of the tool is collaborative editing, NOT long-term reference
> 
> I thought github was the tool that the IETF was supposed to use to do collaborative editing? See RFC8874.
> 
> Lloyd Wood
> lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
> 
> wondering what the IETF mandated editor is.