Re: Meetecho for interim meetings

[Marco Tiloca <[e-mail]>]

Hi Henk,

For CoRE, I can actually choose only between the two options:

"Webex Meeting Pro 200"
"WebEx Personal Conference"

where the first one has always been selected by default and worked fine.

Best,
/Marco

On 2021-04-22 17:28, Henk Birkholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> quickly running though a series of tests with Michael, we were able to 
> to recreate the issue and also schedule meetings that do not exhibit 
> the issue.
>
> You can select a "Meeting type", when you schedule a meeting. You 
> should select "Webex Meeting Pro 200" there.
>
> As you might have guessed, I did not. Selecting "Webex Personal 
> Conference" instead comes with the issue we experienced at the iotops 
> interim.
>
> So, it is pretty easy to circumvent that issue by selecting the 
> "correct" type. Now, I am left wondering, why I have three options to 
> choose from. My options are:
>
> "Webex Meetings 107 Virutal"
> "Webex Meeting Pro 200"
> "WebEx Personal Conference"
>
> Are these options the same for everyone else? Do we need anything else 
> than "Webex Meeting Pro 200"?
>
> Viele Grüße,
>
> Henk
>
> On 21.04.21 10:51, Henk Birkholz wrote:
>> Hi Spencer,
>>
>> I personally know of four individuals that were not able to join. Two 
>> of them presenters, three of them using Linux and one of them using a 
>> Mac.
>>
>> I joined in testing another reoccurring IETF webex instance 
>> afterwards and that worked fine.
>>
>>  From my point of view, it might have something to do with the 
>> individual session I set up and the issue is maybe limited to 
>> "non-app" users.
>>
>> Viele Grüße,
>>
>> Henk
>>
>> On 20.04.21 23:57, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
>>> To the survivors of the IOTOPS meeting ...
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 1:50 PM Henk Birkholz 
>>> <[e-mail] 
>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi all,
>>>
>>>     while I was able to join the IOTOPS webex, I understand that 
>>> quite a
>>>     few
>>>     people where blocked from joining.
>>>
>>>
>>> Did I understand correctly that
>>>
>>>   * a number of participants who were blocked were using Linux 
>>> systems, but
>>>   * some number of participants said they WERE able to join using Linux
>>>     systems?
>>>
>>> I could have gotten that wrong, because I was just listening to the 
>>> general background banter, but that's what I thought I heard.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Spencer
>>>
>>> p.s. Michael Richardson and I co-chair Cellar, which doesn't use 
>>> WebEx for our meetings, but I can't imagine trying to run one of our 
>>> meetings from a cell phone - you'll be shocked to learn that we each 
>>> have a screen open for the video. a screen open in Github, and 
>>> another screen open for CodiMD, at a minimum.
>>>
>>>     Maybe something broke when I set this up. Although there is some 
>>> chance
>>>     that the issue sneaked in with some default setting (as I am not 
>>> aware
>>>     of a deviation from defaults).
>>>
>>>     Whatever happened, I actually hope it was me. If anyone can shed 
>>> a bit
>>>     more light on this - or speak from a similar experience - that 
>>> would of
>>>     course be great.
>>>
>>>     Viele Grüße,
>>>
>>>     Henk
>>>
>>>     On 20.04.21 20:37, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>>      > On 20. Apr 2021, at 18:11, Michael Richardson
>>>     <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>      >>
>>>      >> Today, IOTOPS chairs and speakers found that webex had stopped
>>>     working a few minutes before the meeting.  Some of us are suffering
>>>     with a smartphone with a tiny screen.
>>>      >
>>>      > Amazingly, all other Webex links (IETF or not) that I tried 
>>> today
>>>     properly offer the WebRTC link (“Join via Browser”).
>>>      > Just
>>> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fietf.webex.com%2Fietf%2Fj.php%3FMTID%3Dm633bd0ec88130283104fb7cd84156f3e&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C7aefba0611974e0f9e3308d905a35fff%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C637547021515325899%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ejUzUqF9akzZNMLrV5WLQP4RKSXPJlWAL7YbddnUmTI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>     doesn’t.
>>>      >
>>>      > Iotops Is a relatively young WG.  Maybe something broke when
>>>     setting this up?
>>>      >
>>>      > Grüße, Carsten
>>>      >
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Marco Tiloca
Ph.D., Senior Researcher

Division: Digital System
Department: Computer Science
Unit: Cybersecurity

RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
https://www.ri.se

Phone: [phone]
Isafjordsgatan 22 / Kistagången 16
SE-164 40 Kista (Sweden)