IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Tricky cross-area topics

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sun, 06 October 2019 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147921200E9 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 06:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HxI7261WEXhL for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 06:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9765712009E for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 06:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x96Dv7HO006215; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 14:57:13 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=GlOcNCfe1jAMIQl8ZYt+1Wu1zLC1l456GF4Pa6Cj8JU=; b=mSSInGJvTMODdeRQ3tp1nRBM97gKBQUZF9MyQXCFZGRhiZRxsmggropfbOHxvH8t26QZ fwGUM259sS973/RrC9wzWjFFfCAHyMd+3WEn4zwCX5d98XuTGRzdiSwHgNkP/sJDKD4i d4XuMuJtpFBixQIclO3Ui9hMv9yiw71a8oOUF5eGLuEPn8LAiCPWfDcRVJZk1XyHOXUY N0VGmO6FInyrqgUX5yxEZAsGyN6+BSldwNb+FWTjBOf/tzMckyRulkCPDis2KrdTbcjg IQICxe2LkNGidS6uThybTIJIG4lTwksLHuR5MBGRSc4qwqFojkcKz/ehxCaginy4G/I1 hw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2vejq4f2ea-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:57:13 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x96Dm4P4028078; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 09:57:12 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2vepgx396s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 06 Oct 2019 09:57:11 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 09:57:10 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 09:57:10 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Tricky cross-area topics
Thread-Topic: Tricky cross-area topics
Thread-Index: AQHVeiDrfyMWQtrbVEOfA15zYOf0AKdKrR+AgAJXCYCAALCGgP//8vOA
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 13:57:10 +0000
Message-ID: <55214F7E-86D2-4333-B3BB-02CDB0B9A198@akamai.com>
References: <77b22339-6a8e-8eaa-a695-724deb963dec@nostrum.com> <B5171FA2-F2B8-4BD6-BE9C-F669FCD86373@gmail.com> <6C35326B-7C1B-404F-AE1B-CFA9023CF82B@mnot.net> <1123.1570358631@dooku.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1123.1570358631@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1e.0.191003
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.80]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0E7963C416E720449CB781FA35FD787B@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-06_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=946 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910060140
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-10-06_07:2019-10-03,2019-10-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=929 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1910060142
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/l0BZLylz7yvN6les6hYxVKmoyd8>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 13:57:18 -0000

>    The trend is supposed to now be that shepherds are assigned when the document
    is adopted.  That is so that they can watch to how the consensus is formed.
 
I have never heard, nor been told that.

I have also heard and been told that the WG chairs, perhaps with observation by the AD at a meeting, decide consensus.
 
Where did you get this?   Is it written down in any guidance for WG chairs?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email