Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 16 September 2021 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62CB3A0CF9; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHuj05ICdiRg; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BDC33A0CF0; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [142.169.78.235]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CB9E1F4A5; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id BBBAD1A028E; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:50:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dooku (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DA91A018B; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:50:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival
In-reply-to: <f3177492-7ea9-1a20-11bd-0387e6e80ecd@huitema.net>
References: <f2ea0c4f-9500-391d-b8d1-dcc3ac4a7b1c@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBOeKxO6KOWyC8WBqUxYyqAwqYdKOesBN+2nxtWAy17Mbg@mail.gmail.com> <ADDEE9BD-790B-4E44-982B-DAA15F50722A@tzi.org> <2B11D777-9D50-490F-B7C6-9DD769C789A6@mnot.net> <B6A2905B-6EB9-4A22-AD1A-10C4910408A2@tzi.org> <1534366.1631820151@dooku> <f3177492-7ea9-1a20-11bd-0387e6e80ecd@huitema.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> message dated "Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:39:00 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:50:01 -0400
Message-ID: <1536418.1631821801@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/lqlwo0M3lufJ-hgMSrgNlsviXPY>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:50:11 -0000
Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote: > The IETF already archives mail messages and Internet drafts. How hard > would it be to archive notes and minutes? After all, this texts are > part of the standard making process, covered by the Note Well, etc. Sure, just upload them as minutes to the DT, and it gets archived already. For now, WG chairs need to do that, which also means that they have an opportunity to review the conent. A significant annoyance is that we don't have a standard markdown across all our content archives.
-- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Christian Huitema
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Michael Richardson
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Larry Masinter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Christian Huitema
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Carsten Bormann
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Qin Wu
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Carsten Bormann
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Qin Wu
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… tom petch
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Lloyd W
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Lloyd W
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … David Noveck
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann