IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Document shepherd writeup formats

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 26 November 2019 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFDB120849 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 01:46:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nC5qglbIz91d for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 01:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5BBD12083A for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 01:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.116] (p548DC893.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.200.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47MfDP4Qtmz10Fs; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:46:13 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: Document shepherd writeup formats
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <1C5E38E2-541D-4628-A72A-8DB6E0B87223@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:46:13 +0100
Cc: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 596454370.940262-fbad6997a4f5cbca35dc1ee3623b9180
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6008E90-287D-4469-8007-07F4816A8BD5@tzi.org>
References: <14334f87-1870-0aa2-d066-3cb2a417f649@bluepopcorn.net> <1C5E38E2-541D-4628-A72A-8DB6E0B87223@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/sDiQHJQX4qHZw3uz4AEklwcBHM8>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:46:18 -0000

On Nov 26, 2019, at 07:23, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> 
> For new WG chairs I prefer the question-and-answer format. In my experience new shepherds miss lots of checks which AD has to do if essay-style is used.

This not so new WG chair prefers the question-and-answer format for exactly the same reason pilots like checklists.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email