RE: A quick poll about RFC 7221
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 18 September 2020 18:09 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A48F3A08BB for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaYZ053esuhs for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8BEE3A08AE for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08II94M6022158; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:09:04 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD2F22042; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:09:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 576BC22048; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:09:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.40.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08II91nm022401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:09:01 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Salz, Rich'" <rsalz@akamai.com>, 'Fred Baker' <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <00e001d68940$bc73db70$355b9250$@olddog.co.uk> <4D5CEE7A-2748-4E43-8402-A1FB9441F037@gmail.com> <033a01d68d9f$e5d53500$b17f9f00$@olddog.co.uk> <07B3ABA8-98BD-4902-8A73-BED7C0F291D7@akamai.com> <036f01d68dc3$2c61e2c0$8525a840$@olddog.co.uk> <89136773-A583-43F5-9F91-23DF76A200F6@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <89136773-A583-43F5-9F91-23DF76A200F6@akamai.com>
Subject: RE: A quick poll about RFC 7221
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:09:01 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <03d201d68de6$c9963ff0$5cc2bfd0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQH7L1IPvSCo7KIOVut6zYB9mzmiaQHuMPStAc21tgQBpPbPlAJf18/DAdQ08QCo2MU5EA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.40.230
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25674.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--2.061-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--2.061-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25674.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--2.061500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: wQVy7q402w1NwBTaxUmxQ3FPUrVDm6jtC/ExpXrHizwjRiu1AuxJTBaT UFj6EqlNVsGM5nro+51eb2xJS17QL06cZmu8CZmKuVFL9NtjSQK8xE2H2EuMWamEHtVUeroMo8W MkQWv6iUGJ4JQFnQmGyiNG0gFH6RwavP8b9lJtWr6C0ePs7A07YVH0dq7wY7uOZT3eIxIMUbpvy QcNxEDOLmgSeq24cXjtvVfh+Ibgp5gaOj41m03h6kD5rzoKUp2Yy5eJoy0W+Jneb00n4HWLfbLc MgTsFzqMQcU+dK83tqnyLbqIYI358P9zZjybGuKTVn51J26DC9U11F9HU0HTw==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/t0LPkp-r7VNt7Rtzem9BWg9oir8>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:09:10 -0000
>> It's a good idea. There is a wiki and it might benefit from some edits. > > Link? https://trac.ietf.org/trac/wgchairs/wiki/WikiStart Also via https://www.ietf.org/chairs/ > And then we need to get the AD's to point first-time chairs to look at that. Or, indeed, the other chairs who may be considered friendly. A
- A quick poll about RFC 7221 Adrian Farrel
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Carsten Bormann
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Joel M. Halpern
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Erik Kline
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Andrew G. Malis
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 David Noveck
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Joel M. Halpern
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 David Noveck
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Fred Baker
- RE: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Adrian Farrel
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Salz, Rich
- RE: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Adrian Farrel
- Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Salz, Rich
- RE: A quick poll about RFC 7221 Adrian Farrel