IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 109 Preliminary Agenda

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 18 October 2020 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC59A3A0DBD; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 14:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfYHsLezrkDo; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 14:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CC643A0D7E; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 14:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711AD389AB; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yBVqgiKjEtfT; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1360F389A4; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC10375; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:42:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, manycouches@ietf.org
cc: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF 109 Preliminary Agenda
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxTAQOm=-SwLF3zU18xG75YurKdF-or+hU28+M53+cjtAQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <160288855079.14008.13967692974159638979@ietfa.amsl.com> <30344.1602894208@localhost> <FD995870-E9C6-4099-93AF-253F0A11F56B@tzi.org> <CADaq8jcKK5kUvU3v7+6gEaeqjqxtw-Bii5is_hoq1ugogCoWPg@mail.gmail.com> <20201017193610.GA39170@kduck.mit.edu> <CADaq8je4nFVKkGw3X+Yo53N1xaXrgNRvOw4ZaNA0mT3dsDi-kQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU3KwrKnT4tdkap6raiu3pTGRcGz0miJMSFmTPF-bg4wrA@mail.gmail.com> <21ab833c-c3f1-d70b-96c0-8139dd7092f1@labn.net> <CAM4esxTAQOm=-SwLF3zU18xG75YurKdF-or+hU28+M53+cjtAQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:42:09 -0400
Message-ID: <16871.1603057329@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/up_kW4zSqiO71YK7MJZ2lMco2L4>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:42:14 -0000

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
    > All of the virtual meetings have begun at 12:00 or 13:00 "local" time. No
    > one seriously questioned this choice until it became inconvenient for
    > Eastern Time.

AGAIN, I am not complaining as an Eastern-Time person.
Starting Vancouver later in the day did not particularly help, and I asked
WTF at the time.

Starting Madrid later in the day only really helped EST people, and I asked
about that at the time.

    > To start messing with the start time now would erode the principle of 1-1-1.

Are you saying, "having got it wrong twice, it would unfair if we did it
correctly this time?"

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email