IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed IESG statement on referencing documents behind a paywall

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Fri, 14 June 2019 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8DA1200B5 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OITdw0gjRAwO for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D0412004B for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id x7so545705ybg.5 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rA8HUY5YEgzx0SC128t1XjUj1cHhEiV9sav9dT8NAXg=; b=kraqn4MJDJhqAqTXGIuesHIQhx2cYpNPrfmGiCnub4Y6dtOV+RV25Ex7tiPXzVGY+p QmE296ZqoJ9hdK6lcUuC74GaZRjCtF4wIbXF3Hw+4Rb/cdjG521E9Iz09xLFK1u3OJDc /MH0tgwu+HkVMixgIe+m+yOiX7SMAXU7aZ/dsQ4dAIPPh88IFUFM+A4VK1Vfts4sU12x DKH3BD7lROJKDZldZFNvZOWupbUNLQYHH0fsMFbf6rWoj/nzau8IGPmxFEUnwcKciy78 PUHncHX3fVtKYjYQ5MQfvdNca7JXnY+VeQ55tyJr860dJgi3iZbSRgdvbDl1f6t0t/zx S2bg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rA8HUY5YEgzx0SC128t1XjUj1cHhEiV9sav9dT8NAXg=; b=Ml4LUBmpUYlR7TqdCInB8UgDVmp8TfFzowQqCSFwG8HvRFs4AD3sKf2MRnfPZOV55A 6FS1yY0Bhwthk88vgKY4U44Li3hOIJ9MQiVhM0oArCybpBiOy1Q4uyHWzopFKbDHvez8 O6F4q2k3TYUka4xvWyOrWYgdnViA1kHvVBa4adrdyqG60+N5ujZmlfy2r5i1PgiFtX1T OnIWeHi0fFnU92OMdmJtU2tWL/m/cMFmxSMVdLjDxWnOuREtNJdmS+ZQO0UwdL5fXRqR Hgwj8CEAbpHanNeQgasMtj0BCt7yEzw3DWMPW9E59h5IbCxnpL4Ih8ox5PZ5MYUx4gzA uW6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUAIbHuZrx2Bp2tRf9lfCgXwKt/vOCCrG1QC8Ggs9zQrnBsbTKW ollYr7a0bncilpd0cmDQTmg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwL4jEfb2vj7hyoTtnUWInpRAwTabcDEbVgnYhs4Ty1UvJwEri+CghWvPp9M427fkU+7rIacg==
X-Received: by 2002:a25:60c2:: with SMTP id u185mr18716954ybb.403.1560487603440; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.15] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p2sm504927ywf.105.2019.06.13.21.46.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Proposed IESG statement on referencing documents behind a paywall
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <049a3e4a-8c7d-c4e6-b369-e4fb2d115b9c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:46:42 -0400
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CAC09B0C-7328-4C07-B9BC-0F95633DC3A7@gmail.com>
References: <7A67EAB1-08D4-4901-8A43-0563C64EBA1B@gmail.com> <049a3e4a-8c7d-c4e6-b369-e4fb2d115b9c@gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/vnwkTO1xPVzoBn7pMtWuy1zbXRc>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:46:46 -0000

Hi Stewart,

> On Jun 13, 2019, at 6:01 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Whilst this works, I am not sure why it is needed.
> 
> We have not needed this process in the last 30 years, why do we need it now?

As I said in my mail to Toerless, we needed to handle this exact case for a recent document. We had to improvise a process on how to handle the document in question including a second last call and double checking with the WG. So would you prefer to not have this process written down?

Thanks
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email