Re: problem with recent drafts on tools.ietf.org? {35440727}

[Luigi Iannone <[e-mail]>]

> On 4 Mar 2021, at 20:15, Fred Baker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 3, 2021, at 3:54 PM, Lou Berger <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Well this is a troubling response -- does anyone know if there's plans for tools.ietf.org? I would have thought that some thought would be given to this and maybe some announcement made to the IETF.  Did I miss it???  Are we just destined to the whims of bit rot?
> 
> I think there was an announcement that Henrik was leaving, and I certainly knew that there was a conflict between him and DMS/Glen's work. What might be nice wold be if people could somehow advise the LLC that they use some specific tool, and would like to see it ported into the AMS toolset. I would include the ability to subscribe to a meeting calendar attached to or derived from derived from the IETF Agenda. I use the "tools style" calendar and subscribe to it - in large part because I keep all of my calendars in one tool and have calendars that are unrelated to the IETF, so the ability to subscribe to a calendar that lists a subset of the meetings at a given IETF meeting is very useful to me.
> 

+ 1

I also use the tools style calendar, is a very nice feature that should be Included in the main IETF agenda on the datatracker.

Ciao

L.
 


> For clarity, I am attaching what my calendar looks like fr the week of IETF 110, and includes IETF meetings, ICANN's prep week for ICANN 070, and some work in the ITU, in addition to personal events. If I have a complaint in that, it is that ICANN and ITU don't seem to see the value of subscribing to a calendar, but rather send out events - when then become outdated as time goes on. I would not want IETF to become deficient in that respect.
> 
> <Calendar — Week — 3-7-21 to 3-13-21.pdf>