IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Document shepherd writeup formats

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 26 November 2019 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D40120ACD for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:49:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ek-f77JDx6HT for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:49:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC23120AC9 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:49:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xAQKmwBL037788 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:48:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1574801339; bh=DfqVxyquCRRs2K5dGvvB53o+02sua8fslYDOVcbhNPs=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=G5Q+jSKt9rEshV0c0WSlLV3+OxtRVHAn1FUyrd3SAJclYkesS/B/htmAZ1V2X61ZK rsor3gKQjl3OZ74TIQDEnn7Q8BJXvdlsqu/2KuvyMfXLjmfK4uDoPPbXISxfbuHqnw LXg/XhtUMx+dOK6O6lmeriIpAyhF1nOINCnceMkw=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
Subject: Re: Document shepherd writeup formats
To: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <14334f87-1870-0aa2-d066-3cb2a417f649@bluepopcorn.net> <1C5E38E2-541D-4628-A72A-8DB6E0B87223@isode.com> <F6008E90-287D-4469-8007-07F4816A8BD5@tzi.org> <5DDCF6CB.6030607@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <763DE73D-421B-4855-B327-9C57D6D469C1@jisc.ac.uk> <299B701C-9729-4C50-9436-D70C434E408C@gmail.com> <CAA=duU3bFbeDPWORO+ee=Ud5vU2ikfWUgPsJv0A-rp1WOC8oXg@mail.gmail.com> <39D62E00-A18C-4694-92EC-339DF9DC5CFA@gmail.com> <CACWOCC-2aOY+dJ+GF7S3BUCQb68_5+KhAyda96rGwjHvw8EKvQ@mail.gmail.com> <20191126183709.GB32847@mit.edu>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <2c2ffbce-e3b4-2afb-16bc-e2453f230daf@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:48:58 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191126183709.GB32847@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/yo969yIVAaTJtjXnkU8yVChaCk0>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:49:01 -0000

On 11/26/19 12:37 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:06:41AM -0800, Job Snijders wrote:
>> I like the newer essay style.
>>
>> But what are we trying to solve in this thread? A straw poll on what our
>> favorite color is? :-)
> I think we're trying to ascertain whether the essay style has just been a
> mass hallucination or silently deprecated or something like that.  (AFAIK,
> the answer is "no".)
>
> I see the current Q&A template is dated 1 November 2019; I wonder if that
> update inadvertently removed some text that mentioned the essay-style
> template.  (Or perhaps I was just hallucinating that it ever existed...)

The update did not remove any text that mentioned the essay-style template.

You can see before/after using this changeset:

https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/changeset/16991

It's easiest to parse if you select the side-by-side diff.

RjS

>
> -Ben
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email