[WIMSE] Re: Interim Discussion on AIMS

"Liuchunchi(Peter)" <liuchunchi@huawei.com> Tue, 16 June 2026 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <liuchunchi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: wimse@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: wimse@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF61102174C7; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1781609018; bh=7jJzOj72gojkXpKx+1d5XAg4LFrDhYu/osuUKoCGBIY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=ZWb3udMTbdGNauWTmbrrQqNilq6LbPtx39lfAwSrmvygc5fiDWpOZwboOWjfFVvaM CwFsafrnJMLTEdyqDG1l7FhTKh5QwzwiXsmtcV20JHpoOkHOlePL0imiSkhUz+OfFF Su1TYN/jkBkvaYWSBkUPyhb1rV/BdYdxEIyJksUc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Muz-aMyg-MqE; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70A81021724A; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.150]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4gfkzq4nVHzHnGdH; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:20:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemh500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.181.142]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2A7540574; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:20:23 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemf100008.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.138) by kwepemh500011.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:20:20 +0800
Received: from dggpemr200015.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.242) by dggpemf100008.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:20:19 +0800
Received: from dggpemr200015.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.242]) by dggpemr200015.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.242]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:20:19 +0800
From: "Liuchunchi(Peter)" <liuchunchi@huawei.com>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@MIT.EDU>, "wimse@ietf.org" <wimse@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Interim Discussion on AIMS
Thread-Index: AQHc9GB4mqWmNyNVukS9G5uOTYUNfbZBGNKw
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:20:19 +0000
Message-ID: <cd455afe631b4308b6698f73605c9eb3@huawei.com>
References: <ACD151E2-95CF-42C0-98BC-CA7978B50A80@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ACD151E2-95CF-42C0-98BC-CA7978B50A80@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.216.50.76]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_cd455afe631b4308b6698f73605c9eb3huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: 4JJD6T5HCXYJEN4TAIRSLNEGOJDROFPC
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4JJD6T5HCXYJEN4TAIRSLNEGOJDROFPC
X-MailFrom: liuchunchi@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "draft-klrc-aiagent-auth@ietf.org" <draft-klrc-aiagent-auth@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [WIMSE] Re: Interim Discussion on AIMS
List-Id: WIMSE Workload Identity in Multi-Service Environment <wimse.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wimse/ii-YD8CPkwaQq-yZEwwxU1OJ3LE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wimse>
List-Help: <mailto:wimse-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:wimse-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:wimse@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:wimse-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wimse-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Chairs,

Thanks for putting together the interim. Although I regretfully miss the call due to timezone differences, I support the WG to work on this topic, as I supported on many previous interims and side meetings. NHI management is becoming increasingly important for perimeter security. Some of the sections mentioned in this draft like 9.7.  Human in the Loop  has also been specified in details in our draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ni-wimse-ai-agent-identity/
Some of other works like cross-domain transaction tokens or batch authorization is also brewing, hopefully to submit before Vienna cutoff.

Hopefully this helps with supplying potential solutions to the requirements mentioned by the authors.

Best,
Peter

From: Justin Richer <jricher@MIT.EDU>
Sent: 2026年6月4日 23:27
To: wimse@ietf.org
Subject: [WIMSE] Interim Discussion on AIMS

Hello WIMSE Enthusiasts,

Thank you to everyone who joined the Interim yesterday. Recordings and notes are available from our WG website (https://ietf-wg-wimse.github.io/)

At the interim, there was significant positive interest in the topic presented by the authors of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klrc-aiagent-auth/01/ . The chairs are requesting feedback on the problem statement of agent identity in the context of workloads, and whether this is a problem that we want to potentially address in WIMSE. The chairs would also like feedback on whether the direction or solution proposed in the draft is, more or less, heading in the right direction. We are not looking for feedback on the draft itself or whether the draft has a complete solution in hand.

Please provide your feedback to the list by June 19, 2026.

This is not a formal call for adoption at this time, as we (as a WG) need to push more things out the door before we take on additional active work. That said, the chairs strongly encourage discussion of this work on the WIMSE list.

Thank you,
 — Justin & Pieter