IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wish] Comments about draft-murillo-whip

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Sat, 31 July 2021 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AC13A24D8 for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 05:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id COiOshaBD9Xt for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 05:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA9783A24D3 for <wish@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 05:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id e5so14298871pld.6 for <wish@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 05:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HGJ/5y8OY8S2SIQuoFpFy+q+yubo/H6IR4Iwqh/Ryd0=; b=irbZGG1Wq6ymQcAaSiOVxPzllb4En5L87g8wGdhBJIOifXek68sjWTMfGxXfc+iT8K m4HuaQmN3VQVHs1QD2qp7O3cbOBT8oqi6Fb8brr/ZtxD35YtH3B5sCKQOhouChy3pSt7 RkBpjzM7UTAXz2ccKxLXDFrOVq1gveK/E58LTsROqE9mfJeQbBmL32W0+sf0SM4sVJwG ln9EnogU2f+aq9/+Na5pl+bhW+CGxtJAW/VZjvWGYnbpKKpAm33k5T2QUCiweuciTd49 uJp+IGcKgkCsSs9ynX0dP91zXpLc5sVmhnLqM6ix0YIkpN0QCKGsFKfcaZnqsmfPYDOa SI9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HGJ/5y8OY8S2SIQuoFpFy+q+yubo/H6IR4Iwqh/Ryd0=; b=B0h0svdvmQHPMbqDodt1tT/HeqroVbW4PPGG3Gt+0wdw1waxdAu4DV11c2IQM68Ekv 39ZtK98GEGlV0y9EvjIxvph4YHiTBNiW/3AF4GTZR62Apwwr9IuS7vL5GkRlVYt2SRHf Vt9woCmYhBVR1bWCjQfQDaqu8r8+ucer1TClAyeT8e9Pd66rxTEeFgsoSDayEiHcjfPe 6ruWY21c2mQdUHc6ikUXt5oSiz6k1xs7Bfw2See3zv7uebpgQruucojrZaa5xlmTdTjn iwrDCNOJojVQZ/SavYzMfcEBxrRau4ULGIFAmeizud5iATbPbBvueTfBR8xVDahY58JQ dNHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lhl2/PWtDybDtoZvwWELS6Sgk3moX/0k4OoYm18lXH5xuuelU Qe1bBOtFrE+ZxAYyQzK9n2F5MrtqpOu3BDGt3SE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwww4NPBAAMsEL+D5EukgcG1fHKwdF3zbB3krZt/CdguacDDNlB5wlulEdypoVcOCWBgw6dXh75GQfgftHznSc=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4c0e:: with SMTP id z14mr1382862pga.427.1627735226565; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 05:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87v94rs3sf.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CA+ag07YGPm8VCcaxT5YOot1cTA3pM-fPUkr8fqtuoQOCH-hT8A@mail.gmail.com> <87fsvuk6nj.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87fsvuk6nj.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:40:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+ag07ZyiwFcTa8whUGoizFnL_EFthK5t7qOoxYyULBFc=fakg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: WISH List <wish@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7cb2d05c86aa3fe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/4WcrLul__TFUpLi38jZVpvIDZgM>
Subject: Re: [Wish] Comments about draft-murillo-whip
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 12:40:33 -0000

El sáb., 31 jul. 2021 14:30, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> escribió:

> > Regarding trickle ICE support, note that media servers may not require
> to be
> > signaled the new candidates to do ICE trickle. If the media server ports
> are
> > reachable to the client, it can learn directly the new candidates from
> the
> > stun requests received.
> >
> > Anyway, it would be trivial for those servers to accept the htto request
> and
> > ignore the contents. So we can make it mandatory.
>
> Ok.
>
> > What I am not in favor of making ice restart mandatory on server side,
> so a
> > media server should be able to reject the restart. That would cause the
> client
> > to trigger a new session from scratch.
>
> That's okay, restarting the RTP session should not be prohibitive, but it
> still involves having two paths in the client, one of which will receive
> very little testing.
>
> Sergio, could you please explain what it is that you are worried about?
> Servers using WebRTC libraries that don't support restarts?  Or something
> else?
>

For example i don't support ice restart. I understand that for a
conferencing service which has a lots 9f tracks opened in both ways,
restarting all the conferencing state would be cumbersome.

But when you have a single unidirectional stream, doing a full session
restart is not much more cumbersome than the ice restart.

Best regards
Sergio

>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email