IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wish] WG adoption of draft-murillo-whep

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Thu, 04 January 2024 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157B4C14F6E0 for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:26:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=irif.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EgmfwK1LyLgt for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99FEFC14F616 for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:1]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 404JPvXV010570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:25:58 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by potemkin.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay2/82085) with ESMTP id 404JPu5q012462; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:25:56 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904F43BC4C; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:25:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=irif.fr; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date :received:received; s=dkim-irif; t=1704396354; x=1705260355; bh= XzUWaaH8DKtXXT4kSVaVe3qtDPoK7iaz5SNH5jzFoyA=; b=boSd+a5aM4AjT9Xq em9rIzkjGvqI1edOchCMKFBAIfigi+ij+v618O7DiEm06WNH+s6HcdJUly3sJ4rT KXQJUs5czOWD4YmldOv488u8OBVxjIU4wpJwlM/JzSrsAzRdv6GU2Jjy47nn7qE0 0SAqMMkpjOrFgZ5Z/pO9wdO5KZtqzo7iPJpj27JvePw+uvV458uT6Ej5zEps1k5M ojxYV2fQ5nkkRJu0r5LbvOJXTnmitDFuHe9gUqo7nrVy1gEYYrpwywNvAy5Q9+BM 3JI4Hf4Xy1JQipwkDLVlcMJogSwF2JIrSxS4X8UBsRBUU+m48J7wvuhRnwrnH5mV c9mhgQ==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id lEv-uLvHQLIK; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:25:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 378C53B9FF; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:25:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:25:52 +0100
Message-ID: <87le94q4sf.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, WISH List <wish@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+ag07aeEnxJkAbrbKA2jqDeGeG2f8M8G=PSFkL9DkD4V9ab0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <33B28B00-99D6-4DFC-9AF7-B9F7BF8CDE0F@sn3rd.com> <4dfea0b1-fce0-c99e-74dd-5f04471b1ddf@nostrum.com> <CAOW+2duzprAJe_Q8L-XApGsyz+qmj+sKh+VbJd0968Xev8UZiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+ag07aeEnxJkAbrbKA2jqDeGeG2f8M8G=PSFkL9DkD4V9ab0w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/29.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:25:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (potemkin.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.141]); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 20:25:57 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 65970645.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-Miltered: at potemkin with ID 65970644.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 65970645.000 from potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/null/potemkin.univ-paris7.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 65970644.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 65970645.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 65970644.000 on potemkin.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/BVU8cPyZfb05Snq6HHepWVLNkfI>
Subject: Re: [Wish] WG adoption of draft-murillo-whep
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:26:09 -0000

I support adoption of the WHEP draft.

>> Is there something that WHEP can do that MoQ can't?  If not, why bother
>> creating yet another distribution protocol? 

[...]

> Also, I don't think that we should prevent having a wide range of
> distribution protocols available.

I think the major selling point of WHIP/WHEP is that it's very easy to
implement, assuming that you already have a WebRTC stack.  My implementation
of WHIP is 354 lines of Go code, and about half of this is dealing with
access control and error handling (which is notoriously verbose in Go).

MoQ certainly has a lot of features, and until somebody has identified and
documented a compliant subset of MoQ that is not dramatically more onerous
to implement than WHIP/WHEP, there certainly is a space where WHIP/WHEP is
useful.

-- Juliusz

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status