IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wish] How to detect a crashed client?

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Thu, 09 September 2021 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB123A1AC3 for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Krv9rx9rUO32 for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1F23A1B51 for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 189GAENk017428; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:10:14 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98664C9AAC; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:10:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id lDWK4rTcHbzu; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:10:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0030FC9AAA; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:10:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 18:10:12 +0200
Message-ID: <875yv9hgrf.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Cc: WISH List <wish@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+ag07Y0A9ZbfH9QPEWUS2LjFA4hF7T1kuYc-fCUMLW+VdCRww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <877dfphj5g.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CA+ag07Y0A9ZbfH9QPEWUS2LjFA4hF7T1kuYc-fCUMLW+VdCRww@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 18:10:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 613A31E6.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 613A31E6.003 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 613A31E6.003 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/IsbULxMlEvV_GLVe2OJyhaAb1UA>
Subject: Re: [Wish] How to detect a crashed client?
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 16:10:33 -0000

> Which means that the server has to monitor the ICE requests and timeout
> any client which hasn't issued a new ICE request to renovate the consent
> in 30s.

So we're assuming that the client has a shorter ICE timeout than the
server, right?  Otherwise the client won't get a chance to send an ICE
restart.

Should that be mentioned in the document?

-- Juliusz

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email