Re: [Wish] WISH Charter Ballot Comments

Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com> Thu, 21 January 2021 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFE03A093D for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:53:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.273
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.373, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aruba.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0YCi_-4ZLnfH for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpcmd0986.aruba.it (smtpcmd0986.aruba.it [62.149.156.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BE53A0977 for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:53:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lminiero ([93.35.209.44]) by Aruba Outgoing Smtp with ESMTPSA id 2f5Ol3VF7VOHq2f5Old1Ap; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 19:53:39 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aruba.it; s=a1; t=1611255219; bh=dLQffIQBNbjERwxk+KtfFq0AiL4dawdpUtiuJewgg/A=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FSKMwQOAlN8D5B/F/C+opZO2hduYceCH3KB0tu+opRXax2Z5kRPvK0J2IDQzqWllG ysCXf3rLmdWHa18O7UCXy0Lvr89xm8bYqKPE36K/Tdpd0rDuHpsfFBBZl/QU07If6c W4oMn1518V0okFyMfwtDkn43X4AL/9RsGze/hLLEOBOfGXCewxMVvZc518wN8psTE5 dfrzT7NbInTaGCKmfjhnyrpgHX4hQoG8SGjU5hXfTHIPPgqfJR/roqNMbKqSyX5kb2 arb7d+okkYAruu+ZnZas35rvBdA5XzgZm9LAuzZZGwnMPgSJYzM4gNH2GM3oHRvBSd hUQ0zsVD5PXMQ==
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 19:53:37 +0100
From: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>, "wish@ietf.org" <wish@ietf.org>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Message-ID: <20210121195337.4809a9ef@lminiero>
In-Reply-To: <ce670053-2429-08c5-f88f-e723aa99149b@nostrum.com>
References: <ce670053-2429-08c5-f88f-e723aa99149b@nostrum.com>
Organization: Meetecho
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfJc02oQcrRDcFXKf/w2qYFjL0bi35IACla5awvNXlbiKR1pT1s9j2WgV42iQQMCwj7VgUlokLITuht9YIpF/h1VuLaTvcGQfwpsZL+BR8OnKqvjr/vCK Xk4pnqCa7r1N3qmRPbubdKFhViuRVEmTGBC2G3WF8+8iL6AMlckLg/YjuxaiyDtCAXd9LQJU9AnbpgQsjgd5ikmvZisoT5mFQ9IqFhwqlti+ME6eQlWAPP/n OlvqrJEsC3vKw9gtG5ld4A==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/SIRhQczCxkDuaqQAqQjiP2iyNes>
Subject: Re: [Wish] WISH Charter Ballot Comments
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:53:45 -0000

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:10:30 -0600
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

<snip>
> 
> In terms of the expected participants, we have strong interest and 
> commitment from Millicast and Caffeine, as well as provisional but 
> strong interest from three other major entities in this technology
> space (one broadcasting tool, two realtime CDNs) who I don't feel at
> liberty to name, as they haven't been public about their interest
> *yet*. I would also expect the Janus/Meetecho folks to be keenly
> interested and participate, although I haven't yet touched base with
> them.
> 


Just chiming in to say that yes, we're definitely interested, and I'll
participate actively. We actually did some early prototype already,
using the existing implementation in OBS-WebRTC as a reference, which I
documented a couple of months ago in a blog post. To my knowledge,
there's even people already experimenting with it as we speak, so I'm
definitely interested in following the discussion and contribute.

Lorenzo

-- 
I'm getting older but, unlike whisky, I'm not getting any better
https://twitter.com/elminiero