[Wish] Review of normative language in WHIP draft

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Fri, 06 May 2022 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE55FC15952B for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2022 01:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jE-EJVkA8yIW for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2022 01:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8DDC1594B8 for <wish@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2022 01:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id j14so6741957plx.3 for <wish@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 May 2022 01:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tr7QKiFriNDTzrEs+1uwiWuVAOKZFuEPw/nz37EAUB0=; b=nDWTVNuMIr04lbFfAL20E2RbLgf3j9g9fucQyKGfv/vq3lsBlXj+sjV7/MLKYyvcCq rvVUVWkCKYjk5cz+NKP/mjYvy39rKm/sUBifVcu7vDBKhJQNxPM2pWmPMxZN9CV/S0lI wLVJ1DFXcfzNmki9qSNuyqnvjjCZTvyNrqJ8AEbgPUY4Pkag7v4QSbZKbVLuNrTNyXF7 UPEaGQMKVKJo8MvJH1xPSRw6Wlja3mOeDhpZ89oqYsU3hmVJQlQcNbiACK+c8xY+B09E dkY0MkYKuFe9/vozHRaL+Dnfc8eQMskIZn+CrZKp+d3cYndhS7vrYjqKb7R0nx6dU7Xt s1XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tr7QKiFriNDTzrEs+1uwiWuVAOKZFuEPw/nz37EAUB0=; b=kopjRnWtLKUE5m7CFFwpP4pO41YhueZFF5bkn0aL2Cv0v/1bt71oM5JVZItBHNreoT ZKHlArVa0rDwRc6qYIMlM36Cw/7RSVG7ELNIBxIX9+cV+YKxHVc3QqBuVbpWZA9pvTUj HozxUzZ1okCvf/VW7E8brtDoMKX1aIxPgwpyfbXMcWuD7kS4t1y3QxFAfXFkjVwnkqOa 486PBaa4Zr1ZbDstKodVvzfxokjrSdftAzQ+I96sJIm+OZxc58Q6zTYiGR+pB+Nvln4x hhXtB4bfjE6e4J6Rr94GhHSQKAs2ywXe81Qazr04JtLvm5r/xE9Cb7Sxrt3Jgml+ZHaa PlTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vvTNqqYEK0XeujiNXYzBWysXeQFrsBqfsIKxSt4paumdwLnhr BciPvcCsMaNc2ZjNm0FFzx4FhpbpAyZ+zBQTk8d44+OB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJH0rNFYp81LmTob1g+nKG43RzwwFaDBLmE5Hozm5HpScdA7O/pbODkMZofUbHyvGnam1hvNeDC23ZhppoHEs=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecca:b0:15e:8971:4540 with SMTP id a10-20020a170902ecca00b0015e89714540mr2510388plh.43.1651825255677; Fri, 06 May 2022 01:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 10:20:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+ag07ZZ2d=+MowReFGfb-RLhCDc4b+2RistAeDQrjfd+091HQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: WISH List <wish@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009884e305de538954"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/kBYSVrHrV-i86LaQmM7oNDPkBnI>
Subject: [Wish] Review of normative language in WHIP draft
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 08:20:56 -0000

Hi all,

In the latest meeting it was raised that the use of some normative language
was not correct and some "MUST" should be converted to "must" instead. I
have been reviewing the document and could not find any occurrence that
should be changed.

Juliusz, as I think it was you the one that commented on the issue, could
you highlight an example one of what should be changed? Also for everyone
else, do you have any feedback on this?

Best regards
Sergio