IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wish] I-D Action: draft-ietf-wish-whip-09.txt

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Tue, 25 July 2023 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD130C1519AF for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TlvR7bU34S66 for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C3CC15199E for <wish@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-563d3e4f73cso477176a12.3 for <wish@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; t=1690317091; x=1690921891; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tMHDtEG6KENlFLQAeK9U7qjSiQcn21iVphBfKje8GEE=; b=R3qxjw8HOFNujFsnzkIGFyhoWglFkaSxRZyPAKhx3XNdsq6SVuRffZoTIL5qv4BkH8 rLltbFrABWSMKm6N0YqjV7Uzp8TOp26fcTaUOTddqCfsa9Kopmbf7zKOb+nE2UgTk5/Q vMO7dOmE191n2dmEH+lAScasab+iVbUCUGEaI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690317091; x=1690921891; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tMHDtEG6KENlFLQAeK9U7qjSiQcn21iVphBfKje8GEE=; b=J/RK8KK5Lt0+iMq4UFQ7JrDuaj8PVS1yueKTeVnaBkh5G6eyRVK05l4PzQKbEVixmV VoP+esbr42EhTVknGx0vSU6R0daQPTDtnf+m1bK+RKkEr6W9ZkTd/Olc5pz+Js0KHPiD RMG9HpVbUY2scovjBuJDvcuUZYunqbM2liJbeEq1S01R/sY6CH4sRnCQ17Cslb4ILndZ 2U16T4HFhqIxANqwE4CKM3XvJOdEPuFBwcBhGQB+IJ+eCeayCI6aOtKAHZ8RjrAmBVGn 726RbhB4u2EQSKYTer88gxYMNkdZdX6xQR96GhNjYeELAq1MV2oHiuavUrijvJwe1e1g g8cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLbOU7CODG7wJy7oxVWv+rpVXJB8Qq0hncIpz/Q/PTLPe7HN19hR ++ZTuWxodh6gKj7CUZrZybMlDA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHhujkwsa8kjthMkdBDP+LRJudxTfG2wOanIeON9fKfpX++avv8FxTb6KDKg7o3v+W0sO+FxA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9205:b0:268:420:2e04 with SMTP id m5-20020a17090a920500b0026804202e04mr160974pjo.49.1690317090721; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2001:67c:370:128:f47a:c3de:4b22:1593]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q14-20020a17090a1b0e00b002609cadc56esm11162pjq.11.2023.07.25.13.31.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <87r0oxidoe.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:31:28 -0700
Cc: WISH List <wish@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <232C9F01-4A74-4F94-8BF8-FD6E913AF4C0@sn3rd.com>
References: <169020787246.56433.6627498910257560607@ietfa.amsl.com> <87r0oxidoe.wl-jch@irif.fr>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/oxDKogyUwLHf0ayxNwTXLCFVQqc>
Subject: Re: [Wish] I-D Action: draft-ietf-wish-whip-09.txt
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:31:35 -0000

As I noted during the session, we’ll treat these comments as IETF LC comments.

spt

> On Jul 24, 2023, at 07:31, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the new draft, Sergio.  Looking at the new requirements.
> 
>> WHIP resources MUST ignore any entity-tag value sent by the WHIP client
>> when ICE session matching is not required, as in the HTTP DELETE request.
> 
> I'm not a specialist, but does that not violate HTTP semantics?  The
> document already says that the client SHOULD NOT send DELETE with
> If-Match, but if the client does so anyway, I'd expect the server to
> process it according to usual HTTP semantics.  What about people who
> implement WHIP over an HTTP framework that does not allow easily
> overriding HTTP semantics?
> 
>> When this situation is detected by the WHIP Client, it MUST send a new
>> ICE ICE restart request to the server.
> 
> That used to be SHOULD.  Does that mean that supporting ICE restarts is
> only optional for the server, and mandatory for the client?  (No objection
> if that's the case, but that's not entirely clear from the document.)
> 
> Does the MUST apply even if the server did not return an ETag with the
> initial SDP?
> 
> -- Juliusz
> 
> 
> -- 
> Wish mailing list
> Wish@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status