IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wish] [art] Artart early review of draft-ietf-wish-whip-08

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 11 June 2023 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406BEC14CE44; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 11:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.096, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BoxuFqtegG9q; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 11:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-f54.google.com (mail-pj1-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEEE7C14F73E; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 11:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2566ed9328eso2184631a91.2; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 11:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686509628; x=1689101628; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ZQJNGzWrS1nE+DN93SdoCZWp4RuGao3dFH41yNyI470=; b=UvtREA8lXO0e5miEOXcXHgGdEQ8YYr0tUJgXZfNRi5S/1ViVERyaZr9rxhrvdaDQ6+ FwRFfLAd7C/Dpi7dOHWBaIk98mfOMU8TRiGKYToKYEiTuxOzgSXsgXfyqqjZRNILY/W9 nzIdiqu9hD83WY3+Zs12PXmozoxsIfC75wlVwAHIuXUH6SKYDseBael9GCJx02oWpVtr jjdj0wwGFvJyOrrX1+EoiqhEkSAS+lGAFGm6GhcANIJj0kD8R0ijU8KbEhgWC9zYWYpv qavtOF8rHoTwZoY0+vc9fMUdRjGHWSLuKxeODv4/GuEVjcD2nJn0rD8SsNQG4Q6eW5Mn yQLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxQKKDgaNu92roR8PyHTn3g7EhRB5yPhndk/2y10CC95Wr1IVbz IUzHTa1DmQL4MncpaKURvr0YOMgYTJSSnRXAJxpZ8gpv
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7j2BevEzqU1NH4n+z8971Ia1ZeoEiGADzpMNBkKL5+ORNKpQlFawmAwDNFO1pzPJC1CgKRR7Ks2f2UWEuTO4s=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:de94:b0:256:93bf:c731 with SMTP id n20-20020a17090ade9400b0025693bfc731mr6701347pjv.13.1686509628113; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 11:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168650749719.62197.6608203180443233736@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <168650749719.62197.6608203180443233736@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:53:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVADbfTFDEnBD1ZJhP4msKPnSGQgYKUPd-+Euko4sjBFgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-wish-whip.all@ietf.org, wish@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/qnF0m8ZEvHyGKyhzLiLA4UqbZSo>
Subject: Re: [Wish] [art] Artart early review of draft-ietf-wish-whip-08
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 18:53:52 -0000

Another small thing: as I quoted this from the document...

> > Each STUN/TURN server will be returned using the "Link" header
> > field [RFC8288] with a "rel" attribute value of "ice-server".
> > The Link target URI is the server URL as defined in [RFC7064]
> > and [RFC7065].

Thanks to Dave Crocker for noting that there's something wrong with
"each server will be returned".  I think you mean to say that "A
reference to each STUN/TURN server will be returned...," or some such.
The servers themselves will, of course, remain in their data centers.

Barry

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status