Re: [Wish] Implementation report for draft-ietf-wish-whip-00

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Thu, 09 September 2021 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE29A3A1380 for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o3zc0CejyX-I for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC03A3A1C0A for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 189GdEHU027562 for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:39:14 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D35CA04F for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:39:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id kaupG6WZV22O for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:39:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EEAECA04A for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:39:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 18:39:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87wnnpg0un.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: wish@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <874kathgcl.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <874kathgcl.wl-jch@irif.fr>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.1 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 18:39:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 613A38B2.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 613A38B2.002 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 613A38B2.002 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/vziX7JhBU4M8w4pPZEVesCNDTUM>
Subject: Re: [Wish] Implementation report for draft-ietf-wish-whip-00
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 16:39:22 -0000

>      - what happens if a candidate is followed by random non-JSON garbage?
>        Is that an error?  If so, MUST I return an error or MAY I return an
>        error?  I'm currently just ignoring the garbage.

Looking at the draft again, it doesn't look like the candidate is JSON,
it's just the raw SDP.  Since we're doing bundle, the sdpMLineIndex is
necessarily 0, so it doesn't need to be sent.

Is that right?

-- Juliusz