Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal
"Barry M. Leiner" <leiner@nsipo.nasa.gov> Fri, 12 November 1993 22:02 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13891; 12 Nov 93 17:02 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13887; 12 Nov 93 17:02 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23657; 12 Nov 93 17:02 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.09085-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 12 Nov 1993 21:09:26 +0000
Received: from dscs.arc.nasa.gov by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.22912-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 12 Nov 1993 21:09:07 +0000
Received: from localhost.arc.nasa.gov by dscs.arc.nasa.gov (4.1/1.5T) id AA22432; Fri, 12 Nov 93 13:08:54 PST
Message-Id: <9311122108.AA22432@dscs.arc.nasa.gov>
To: "Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)" <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>
Cc: RARE & IETF OSI-DS wg <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, ietf-wnils@ucdavis.edu, apples@surfnet.nl
Subject: Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Nov 93 12:52:44 +0100." <9311111152.AA11328@survival.surfnet.nl>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1993 13:08:54 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Barry M. Leiner" <leiner@nsipo.nasa.gov>
Erik, I think the document captures the discussion I heard and should move things forward. One question, though. Most of this discussion is (appropriately) about the technical issues of WPS. Given the difficulty over the past several years of establishing a ubiquitous WPS, despite the best efforts of a large number of people, and despite the availability of reasonable if not perfect technology, I wonder about deployment and operational issues. For example, consider the problem of maintaining accurate information. I can imagine several possible modes. 1. user centered - A user maintains the information on him/herself with some friendly little client program, and then interacts with all the databases that should know about him/her. For example, I would like to be "findable" via USRA, IETF, IEEE, ACM, Mt. View, Sunnyvale, etc. Do I need to establish a primary database (primary server) for me? etc. 2. organization based - user doesn't want to do anything to maintain the information, and relies on his/her organization (company, local geographic server, etc.) to maintain the information. 3. central server based - something like the old whois service but broken down into some fairly large categories. Now for each of them, the problems of limited access to the information, maintenance, distribution/replication, etc. needs to be addressed. So bottom line - has the "operational scenario(s)" been established for WPS, against which the technical work is being done? regards, Barry
- Directory Services Work coordination proposal Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal Barry M. Leiner
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal Masataka Ohta
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal Simon E Spero
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal John Curran
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal Simon Spero
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal John Curran
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal pays
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal Masataka Ohta
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal John Curran
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal John Curran
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal sri
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal sri
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)
- Re: Directory Services Work coordination proposal Barry M. Leiner