Re: Change of delimiters and separators

"Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)" <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl> Mon, 27 June 1994 07:52 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00388; 27 Jun 94 3:52 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00380; 27 Jun 94 3:52 EDT
Received: from [128.120.250.250] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00818; 27 Jun 94 3:52 EDT
Received: by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (8.6.9/UCD2.50) id AAA13080; Mon, 27 Jun 1994 00:44:59 -0700
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-wnils-request@ucdavis.edu
Received: from survis.surfnet.nl by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (8.6.9/UCD2.50) id AAA13073; Mon, 27 Jun 1994 00:44:58 -0700
Message-Id: <199406270744.AAA13073@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>
Received: from survis.surfnet.nl by survis.surfnet.nl with SMTP (PP); Mon, 27 Jun 1994 09:44:42 +0200
To: Rickard Schoultz <schoultz@sunet.se>
Cc: ietf-wnils@ucdavis.edu
Subject: Re: Change of delimiters and separators
In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 26 Jun 1994 14:27:30 +0200. <199406261227.OAA03865@sunic.sunet.se>
Organisation: SURFnet bv
Address: Cluetinckborch, P.O. Box 19035, 3501 DA Utrecht, NL
Phone: +31 30 310290
Telefax: +31 30 340903
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <26647.772703080.1@SURFnet.nl>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 1994 09:44:40 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)" <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>

Rickart,

What is the reason to change? Does it make sense to use the same
delimiters that the Solo protocol uses, just for sheer consistency
towards implementors? Just two questions out of curiosity, not because
I have a strong opinion either way.

Erik