Agenda for Houston?

Simon E Spero <> Sat, 23 October 1993 19:59 UTC

Received: from by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03258; 23 Oct 93 15:59 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03250; 23 Oct 93 15:59 EDT
Received: from by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14986; 23 Oct 93 15:59 EDT
Received: by (4.1/UCD2.05) id AA26208; Sat, 23 Oct 93 12:40:44 PDT
Received: from by (4.1/UCD2.05) id AA26063; Sat, 23 Oct 93 12:35:21 PDT
Received: from by (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA29265; Sat, 23 Oct 93 15:37:00 EDT
Message-Id: <>
Subject: Agenda for Houston?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1993 15:36:56 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Simon E Spero <>

Has an agenda for Houston been posted? I can't find it, but then I've
been testing some new mailbox-cleaners, and I can't find a lot of things :-)

There's a couple of things I'd like to discuss at the meeting. 

1) No new features for six months? 
 Could we agree to a six month moratorium on new features after November? 
That way we can get some stability and get some more interoprability testing

2) Template values:
 Can we add length+value support to templates? It makes returning binary 
elements much simpler, and doesn't cost much to implement?